@Override
    synchronized void addShutdownHook(Thread hook) {
      hooks.add(hook);
    }

    synchronized void shutdown() throws InterruptedException {
      for (Thread hook : hooks) {
        hook.start();
      }
      for (Thread hook : hooks) {
        hook.join();
      }
    }
  }

  /* Half of a 1-second timeout in nanoseconds */

    return result;
  }

  /*
   * If I understand correctly:
   *
   * This needs to be a @JsMethod so that J2CL knows to look for a JavaScript implemention of
   * it in Platform.native.js. (The JavaScript implementation inline below is visible to *GWT*, but
   * *J2CL* doesn't look at it.)
   *
   * However, once it's a @JsMethod, GWT produces a warning. That's because (a) the *other* purpose

 *
 * <pre>
 * interface Book {...}
 * public class Books {
 *   public static Book hardcover(String title) {...}
 *   public static Book paperback(String title) {...}
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>And all the created {@code Book} instances can be tested with:
 *
 * <pre>
 * new ClassSanityTester()
 *     .forAllPublicStaticMethods(Books.class)
 *     .thatReturn(Book.class)

 *
 * <p>For testing against the returned instances from a static factory class, such as
 *
 * <pre>
 * interface Book {...}
 * public class Books {
 *   public static Book hardcover(String title) {...}
 *   public static Book paperback(String title) {...}
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>please use {@link ClassSanityTester#forAllPublicStaticMethods}.
 *

    //    queue, immediately followed by another thread taking the next element in the queue. That
    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually

  static {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Long> testLongsBuilder = ImmutableSet.builder();
    ImmutableSet.Builder<BigInteger> testBigIntegersBuilder = ImmutableSet.builder();

    // The values here look like 111...11101...010 in binary, where the initial 111...1110 takes
    // up exactly as many bits as can be represented in the significand (24 for float, 53 for

  private TestSuppressor suppressor;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    suppressor = new TestSuppressor();
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // TODO(cpovirk): Look up Build.VERSION.SDK_INT reflectively.
  public void testCreate() {
    assertThat(Closer.create().suppressor).isInstanceOf(Closer.SuppressingSuppressor.class);
  }

  public void testNoExceptionsThrown() throws IOException {

                  for (Integer node : graph.nodes()) {
                    Set<Integer> unused = graph.successors(node);
                  }
                  /*
                   * Also look up an earlier node so that, if the graph is using MapRetrievalCache,
                   * we read one of the fields declared in that class.
                   */
                  Set<Integer> unused = graph.successors(first);

   * GWT SortedMap implementation that we delegate to throws
   * NullPointerException if the comparator does. Since our construction
   * methods ensure that null is never present in the map, it's OK for the
   * comparator to look for it wherever it wants.
   *
   * Note that we do NOT touch the comparator returned by comparator(), which
   * should be identical to the one the user passed in. We touch only the

    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return f.hashCode() ^ p.hashCode();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // TODO(cpovirk): maybe make this look like the method call does ("Predicates.compose(...)")
      return p + "(" + f + ")";
    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**
   * @see Predicates#contains(Pattern)
   */