- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 1 - 10 of 153 for Case (0.29 sec)
-
docs/en/docs/tutorial/response-model.md
### Return a Response Directly The most common case would be [returning a Response directly as explained later in the advanced docs](../advanced/response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank}. ```Python hl_lines="8 10-11" {!> ../../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_02.py!} ```
Plain Text - Registered: Sun Apr 28 07:19:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 18 19:53:19 GMT 2024 - 17.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/behind-a-proxy.md
## Proxy with a stripped path prefix Having a proxy with a stripped path prefix, in this case, means that you could declare a path at `/app` in your code, but then, you add a layer on top (the proxy) that would put your **FastAPI** application under a path like `/api/v1`. In this case, the original path `/app` would actually be served at `/api/v1/app`. Even though all your code is written assuming there's just `/app`.
Plain Text - Registered: Sun Apr 28 07:19:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 18 19:53:19 GMT 2024 - 11.6K bytes - Viewed (2) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/dataclasses.md
In some cases, you might still have to use Pydantic's version of `dataclasses`. For example, if you have errors with the automatically generated API documentation. In that case, you can simply swap the standard `dataclasses` with `pydantic.dataclasses`, which is a drop-in replacement: ```{ .python .annotate hl_lines="1 5 8-11 14-17 23-25 28" } {!../../../docs_src/dataclasses/tutorial003.py!} ```
Plain Text - Registered: Sun Apr 28 07:19:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 18 19:53:19 GMT 2024 - 4.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/deployment/concepts.md
Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple times, in that case, it's a lot easier to handle. !!! tip Also, keep in mind that depending on your setup, in some cases you **might not even need any previous steps** before starting your application. In that case, you wouldn't have to worry about any of this. 🤷 ### Examples of Previous Steps Strategies
Plain Text - Registered: Sun Apr 28 07:19:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 18 19:53:19 GMT 2024 - 18K bytes - Viewed (0) -
analysis/analysis-api-fe10/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/analysis/api/descriptors/symbols/descriptorBased/KtFe10DescValueParameterSymbol.kt
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.descriptors.symbols.calculateHashCode import org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.descriptors.symbols.descriptorBased.base.KtFe10DescSymbol import org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.descriptors.symbols.descriptorBased.base.toKtType import org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.descriptors.symbols.isEqualTo import org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.descriptors.symbols.pointers.KtFe10NeverRestoringSymbolPointer
Plain Text - Registered: Fri Apr 26 08:18:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 19 11:06:46 GMT 2024 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
okhttp-logging-interceptor/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/logging/HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt
fun redactHeader(name: String) { val newHeadersToRedact = TreeSet(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER) newHeadersToRedact += headersToRedact newHeadersToRedact += name headersToRedact = newHeadersToRedact } fun redactQueryParams(vararg name: String) { val newQueryParamsNameToRedact = TreeSet(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER) newQueryParamsNameToRedact += queryParamsNameToRedact
Plain Text - Registered: Fri Apr 26 11:42:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Sat Apr 06 09:14:38 GMT 2024 - 11.2K bytes - Viewed (1) -
analysis/analysis-api-fir/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/analysis/api/fir/components/KtFirImportOptimizer.kt
* * In such case, [FirQualifiedAccessExpression] representing the call references * the original `Base.bar` callable symbol instead of `MyObject.bar`, because there are * no separate symbol for that case. * * Java statics present a similar case - they can be imported not only from the declaring class,
Plain Text - Registered: Fri Apr 26 08:18:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 19 11:06:47 GMT 2024 - 24.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
analysis/analysis-api-fir/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/analysis/api/fir/references/FirReferenceResolveHelper.kt
// // TODO: This seems a little indirect. Is there a better way to do this? For FE1.0 there is // a special `TypeAliasConstructorDescriptor` for this case. For FIR there is // FirConstructor.originalConstructorIfTypeAlias but that doesn't seem to help here as it // is null for the constructors we get.
Plain Text - Registered: Fri Apr 26 08:18:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Apr 15 10:59:01 GMT 2024 - 37.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/events.md
## Use Case Let's start with an example **use case** and then see how to solve it with this. Let's imagine that you have some **machine learning models** that you want to use to handle requests. 🤖
Plain Text - Registered: Sun Apr 28 07:19:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 18 19:53:19 GMT 2024 - 7.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
analysis/analysis-api-fir/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/analysis/api/fir/scopes/DeclarationsInPackageProvider.kt
* stub-indexing binary libraries). And in general, querying the symbol names provider might be faster since its sets are cached, which is * not necessarily the case for declaration providers (e.g. the IDE declaration provider hitting the index without caching). * * However, since symbol names providers may not be able to compute name sets per their contract, we may have to fall back to the
Plain Text - Registered: Fri Apr 26 08:18:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Apr 23 10:55:55 GMT 2024 - 5.4K bytes - Viewed (0)