t.Fatalf("Build OR condition, but got %v", result.Statement.SQL.String())
	}

	result = dryDB.Where("role = ?", "admin").Where(DB.Or("role = ?", "super_admin").Or("role = ?", "admin")).Find(&User{})
	if !regexp.MustCompile("SELECT \\* FROM .*users.* WHERE .*role.* = .+ AND (.*role.* = .+ OR .*role.* = .+)").MatchString(result.Statement.SQL.String()) {

                <br>
                <p>
                If you did this intentionally, please accept the change and provide an explanation:
                <a class="btn btn-info" role="button" data-toggle="collapse" href="#accept-${changeId}" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseExample">Accept this change</a>
                <div class="collapse" id="accept-${changeId}">
                  <div class="well">

		return nil, errors.New("both the token file and the role ARN are required")
	case conf.AccessKey == "" && conf.SecretKey != "" || conf.AccessKey != "" && conf.SecretKey == "":
		return nil, errors.New("both the access and secret keys are required")
	case conf.AWSRole && (conf.AWSRoleWebIdentityTokenFile != "" || conf.AWSRoleARN != "" || conf.AccessKey != "" || conf.SecretKey != ""):

    /*
     * @see junit.framework.TestCase#setUp()
     */
    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() throws Exception {
        conflictResolver = (ConflictResolver) container.lookup(ConflictResolver.ROLE, roleHint);

        a1 = createArtifact("a", "1.0");
        a2 = createArtifact("a", "2.0");
        b1 = createArtifact("b", "1.0");
    }

        <field>
          <name>roles</name>
          <version>3.0.0+</version>
          <description>
            The roles the contributor plays in the project. Each role is described by a
            {@code role} element, the body of which is a role name. This can also be used to
            describe the contribution.
          </description>
          <association>
            <type>String</type>