* we change the rate.
   */
  public void testWeNeverGetABurstMoreThanOneSec() {
    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(1.0, stopwatch);
    int[] rates = {1000, 1, 10, 1000000, 10, 1};
    for (int rate : rates) {
      int oneSecWorthOfWork = rate;
      stopwatch.sleepMillis(rate * 1000);
      limiter.setRate(rate);
      long burst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());

   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,
   * and because threads are typically not bound to CPUS forever,
   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under

    double actualReportedFpp = bf.expectedFpp();
    assertEquals(expectedReportedFpp, actualReportedFpp, 0.00033);
  }

  /** Sanity checking with many combinations of false positive rates and expected insertions */
  public void testBasic() {
    for (double fpr = 0.0000001; fpr < 0.1; fpr *= 10) {
      for (int expectedInsertions = 1; expectedInsertions <= 10000; expectedInsertions *= 10) {

   * we change the rate.
   */
  public void testWeNeverGetABurstMoreThanOneSec() {
    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(1.0, stopwatch);
    int[] rates = {1000, 1, 10, 1000000, 10, 1};
    for (int rate : rates) {
      int oneSecWorthOfWork = rate;
      stopwatch.sleepMillis(rate * 1000);
      limiter.setRate(rate);
      long burst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());

        try {
            PacDataInputStream pacStream = new PacDataInputStream(new DataInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data)));

            // Skip firsts
            pacStream.skipBytes(20);

            // Dates
            this.logonTime = pacStream.readFiletime();
            this.logoffTime = pacStream.readFiletime();
            this.kickOffTime = pacStream.readFiletime();
            this.pwdLastChangeTime = pacStream.readFiletime();

   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,
   * and because threads are typically not bound to CPUS forever,
   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under

    double actualReportedFpp = bf.expectedFpp();
    assertEquals(expectedReportedFpp, actualReportedFpp, 0.00033);
  }

  /** Sanity checking with many combinations of false positive rates and expected insertions */
  public void testBasic() {
    for (double fpr = 0.0000001; fpr < 0.1; fpr *= 10) {
      for (int expectedInsertions = 1; expectedInsertions <= 10000; expectedInsertions *= 10) {

   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,
   * and because threads are typically not bound to CPUS forever,
   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under

 *       thoroughly as possible.
 *   <li><b>bit-dispersing:</b> masking out any <i>single bit</i> from a hash code should yield only
 *       the expected <i>twofold</i> increase to all collision rates. Informally, the "information"
 *       in the hash code should be as evenly "spread out" through the hash code's bits as possible.
 *       The result is that, for example, when choosing a bucket in a hash table of size 2^8,