// that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

        componentProvider: ComponentProvider
    ): AnalysisResult? {
        // Single-module [KtFe10AnalysisHandlerExtension] can be registered without specific use-site module.
        // Simple null-check below will skip the bail-out.
        if (useSiteModule != null &&
            module.name.asString().removeSurrounding("<", ">") != useSiteModule.moduleName
        ) {
            // there is no way to properly map KtModule to ModuleDescriptor,

      }
    }
  }

  private fun readAndWriteFrames() {
    check(socket == null)
    val socket = serverSocket!!.accept()!!
    this.socket = socket

    // Bail out now if this instance was closed while waiting for the socket to accept.
    synchronized(this) {
      if (executor.isShutdown) {
        socket.close()
        return
      }
    }

                try {
                    rootDirectory = request.getSession().getRootDirectory();
                } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
                    // if no root directory, bail out
                    return;
                }
                List<Path> toLoad = new ArrayList<>();
                Path root = defaultModelBuilder.getModelProcessor().locateExistingPom(rootDirectory);

			t.Errorf("ReadFile(%s) error=%v", path, err2)
			return
		}
	}
	if err != zt.Error {
		t.Errorf("error=%v, want %v", err, zt.Error)
		return
	}

	// bail if file is not zip
	if err == ErrFormat {
		return
	}

	// bail here if no Files expected to be tested
	// (there may actually be files in the zip, but we don't care)
	if zt.File == nil {
		return
	}

	if z.Comment != zt.Comment {

   * a bug in the class under test) but that we time out fairly promptly when the method is expected
   * to hang (possibly too quickly, but too-quick failures should be very unlikely, given that we
   * used to bail after 20ms during the expected-successful tests, and there we saw a failure rate
   * of ~1/5000, meaning that the other thread's get() call nearly always completes within 20ms if
   * it's going to complete at all).
   *

   * a bug in the class under test) but that we time out fairly promptly when the method is expected
   * to hang (possibly too quickly, but too-quick failures should be very unlikely, given that we
   * used to bail after 20ms during the expected-successful tests, and there we saw a failure rate
   * of ~1/5000, meaning that the other thread's get() call nearly always completes within 20ms if
   * it's going to complete at all).
   *