(which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,
                   and I gave up trying to figure out how to do that for test
                   compilation only. -->

                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,
                   and I gave up trying to figure out how to do that for test
                   compilation only. -->

    val request =
      Request
        .Builder()
        .header("Authorization", "Client-ID $IMGUR_CLIENT_ID")
        .url("https://api.imgur.com/3/image")
        .post(ProgressRequestBody(requestBody, progressListener))
        .build()

    client.newCall(request).execute().use { response ->
      if (!response.isSuccessful) throw IOException("Unexpected code $response")

            .post(RequestBody.create(MEDIA_TYPE_MARKDOWN, postBody))
            .build();

        try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
          if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

          System.out.println(response.body().string());
        }
      }
    ```

        minThresholdPosition = pivotNewIndex;
      } else {
        break;
      }
      iterations++;
      if (iterations >= maxIterations) {
        @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // safe because we pass sort() a range that contains real Ts
        T[] castBuffer = (T[]) buffer;
        // We've already taken O(k log k), let's make sure we don't take longer than O(k log k).
        sort(castBuffer, left, right + 1, comparator);

      MEDIA_TYPE_PNG);

    Request request = new Request.Builder()
      .header("Authorization", "Client-ID " + IMGUR_CLIENT_ID)
      .url("https://api.imgur.com/3/image")
      .post(new ProgressRequestBody(requestBody, progressListener))
      .build();

    Response response = client.newCall(request).execute();
    if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

  fun interruptWritingRequestBody() {
    server.enqueue(MockResponse())
    server.start()
    val call =
      client.newCall(
        Request
          .Builder()
          .url(server.url("/"))
          .post(
            object : RequestBody() {
              override fun contentType() = null

              override fun writeTo(sink: BufferedSink) {
                for (i in 0..9) {
                  sink.writeByte(0)

            Let's take the warnings for one module, c.g.c.base.testModule, as an example:

              [INFO] Validating units:
              [INFO]    Ignored 53 units with compilation errors in first pass.
              [INFO] Compile with -strict or with -logLevel set to TRACE or DEBUG to see all errors.

            Turning up the log level, we see that GWT is trying to compile classes from other

// Java 21 Sequenced Collections support
SequencedCollection<String> sequenced = CollectionsUtil.newLinkedHashSet();
String first = CollectionsUtil.getFirst(sequenced);
String last = CollectionsUtil.getLast(sequenced);
SequencedCollection<String> reversed = CollectionsUtil.reversed(sequenced);

// Specialized collections

    return Types.newParameterizedTypeWithOwner(
        resolvedOwner, (Class<?>) resolvedRawType, resolvedArgs);
  }

  private static <T> T expectArgument(Class<T> type, Object arg) {
    try {
      return type.cast(arg);
    } catch (ClassCastException e) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(arg + " is not a " + type.getSimpleName());
    }
  }

  /** A TypeTable maintains mapping from {@link TypeVariable} to types. */