}
    ParameterizedType subtype =
        (ParameterizedType)
            new TypeToken<BaseWithTypeVar<List<?>>>() {}.getSubtype(Outer.Sub.class).getType();
    assertEquals(Outer.Sub.class, subtype.getRawType());
    assertThat(subtype.getActualTypeArguments()[0]).isInstanceOf(WildcardType.class);
    ParameterizedType owner = (ParameterizedType) subtype.getOwnerType();

    }
    ParameterizedType subtype =
        (ParameterizedType)
            new TypeToken<BaseWithTypeVar<List<?>>>() {}.getSubtype(Outer.Sub.class).getType();
    assertEquals(Outer.Sub.class, subtype.getRawType());
    assertThat(subtype.getActualTypeArguments()[0]).isInstanceOf(WildcardType.class);
    ParameterizedType owner = (ParameterizedType) subtype.getOwnerType();

        listener.onClosed(this)
      }
    }
  }

  private fun ResponseBody.isEventStream(): Boolean {
    val contentType = contentType() ?: return false
    return contentType.type == "text" && contentType.subtype == "event-stream"
  }

  override fun onFailure(
    call: Call,
    e: IOException,
  ) {
    listener.onFailure(this, e, null)
  }

  override fun request(): Request = request

      void visitClass(Class<?> t) {
        result.set(t.getComponentType());
      }
    }.visit(type);
    return result.get();
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code ? extends X} if any of {@code bounds} is a subtype of {@code X[]}; or null
   * otherwise.
   */
  private static @Nullable Type subtypeOfComponentType(Type[] bounds) {
    for (Type bound : bounds) {
      Type componentType = getComponentType(bound);

          // subtyping between declared type bound and actual type bound. So it's possible that we
          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.

          // subtyping between declared type bound and actual type bound. So it's possible that we
          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.

      void visitClass(Class<?> t) {
        result.set(t.getComponentType());
      }
    }.visit(type);
    return result.get();
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code ? extends X} if any of {@code bounds} is a subtype of {@code X[]}; or null
   * otherwise.
   */
  private static @Nullable Type subtypeOfComponentType(Type[] bounds) {
    for (Type bound : bounds) {
      Type componentType = getComponentType(bound);