/// tip

         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the
         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The

        Boolean result1 = (Boolean) constantTimeMethod.invoke(null, password1, password2);
        Boolean result2 = (Boolean) constantTimeMethod.invoke(null, password1, password3);

        assertTrue(result1, "Identical passwords should be equal");
        assertFalse(result2, "Different passwords should not be equal");
    }

    /**
     * Measure the average time for equals operations.
     */

         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the
         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The

    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (NativeTypeVariableEquals.NATIVE_TYPE_VARIABLE_ONLY) {
        // equal only to our TypeVariable implementation with identical bounds
        if (obj != null
            && Proxy.isProxyClass(obj.getClass())
            && Proxy.getInvocationHandler(obj) instanceof TypeVariableInvocationHandler) {

    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (NativeTypeVariableEquals.NATIVE_TYPE_VARIABLE_ONLY) {
        // equal only to our TypeVariable implementation with identical bounds
        if (obj != null
            && Proxy.isProxyClass(obj.getClass())
            && Proxy.getInvocationHandler(obj) instanceof TypeVariableInvocationHandler) {

Each of these containers running your app would normally have **just one process** (e.g. a Uvicorn process running your FastAPI application). They would all be **identical containers**, running the same thing, but each with its own process, memory, etc. That way you would take advantage of **parallelization** in **different cores** of the CPU, or even in **different machines**.

This style of using `async` and `await` is relatively new in the language.

But it makes working with asynchronous code a lot easier.

This same syntax (or almost identical) was also included recently in modern versions of JavaScript (in Browser and NodeJS).

But before that, handling asynchronous code was quite more complex and difficult.

### Otras formas de código asíncrono

Este estilo de usar `async` y `await` es relativamente nuevo en el lenguaje.

Pero hace que trabajar con código asíncrono sea mucho más fácil.

Esta misma sintaxis (o casi idéntica) también se incluyó recientemente en las versiones modernas de JavaScript (en el Navegador y NodeJS).

Pero antes de eso, manejar el código asíncrono era mucho más complejo y difícil.

   * BloomFilter}.
   *
   * <p>The {@code Funnel} to be used is not encoded in the stream, so it must be provided here.
   * <b>Warning:</b> the funnel provided <b>must</b> behave identically to the one used to populate
   * the original Bloom filter!
   *
   * @throws IOException if the InputStream throws an {@code IOException}, or if its data does not