## Reporting a Vulnerability

If you think you found a vulnerability, and even if you are not sure about it, please report it right away by sending an email to: ******@****.***. Please try to be as explicit as possible, describing all the steps and example code to reproduce the security issue.

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

        closeInternal(lastWriteTime, true);
    }

    /**
     * @param lastWriteTime
     * @throws SmbException
     */
    void closeInternal(final long lastWriteTime, final boolean explicit) throws CIFSException {
        final SmbTreeHandleImpl t = this.tree;
        try {
            if (t != null && isValid()) {
                if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {

I think `Union[SomeType, None]` is more explicit about what it means.

It's just about the words and names. But those words can affect how you and your teammates think about the code.

As an example, let's take this function:

## 0.110.3

### Docs

* 📝 Update references to Python version, FastAPI supports all the current versions, no need to make the version explicit. PR [#11496](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/11496) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo).

  * Varios de estos flujos son apropiados para construir un proveedor de autenticación OAuth 2.0 (como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc.):
    * `implicit`
    * `clientCredentials`
    * `authorizationCode`
  * Pero hay un "flujo" específico que puede usarse perfectamente para manejar la autenticación directamente en la misma aplicación:

    * Некоторые из этих "потоков" подходят для реализации аутентификации через сторонний сервис использующий OAuth 2.0 (например, Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub и т.д.):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Но есть один конкретный "поток", который может быть идеально использован для обработки аутентификации непосредственно в том же приложении:

* `oauth2`: todas as formas do OAuth2 para lidar com segurança (chamados "fluxos").
    * Vários desses fluxos são apropriados para construir um provedor de autenticação OAuth2 (como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Mas existe um “fluxo” específico que pode ser perfeitamente usado para resolver autenticação diretamente na mesma aplicação:

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

* `oauth2`: Alle OAuth2-Methoden zum Umgang mit Sicherheit (genannt „Flows“).
    * Mehrere dieser Flows eignen sich zum Aufbau eines OAuth 2.0-Authentifizierungsanbieters (wie Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub usw.):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Es gibt jedoch einen bestimmten „Flow“, der perfekt für die direkte Abwicklung der Authentifizierung in derselben Anwendung verwendet werden kann: