if len(l.lockUID) == locks*readers {
						t.Fatalf("objects uids all remain, unlikely")
					}
					if len(l.lockMap) == 0 {
						t.Fatalf("objects all deleted, 0 remains")
					}
					if len(l.lockUID) == 0 {
						t.Fatalf("objects uids all deleted, 0 remains")
					}

					start = time.Now()
					l.expireOldLocks(-time.Minute)

            assertTrue(result.success(), "Compatibility fix should succeed");
            assertTrue(result.modifiedCount() > 0, "Should have removed duplicate dependency");

            // Verify only one dependency remains
            Editor editor = new Editor(document);
            Element root = editor.root();
            Element dependencyManagement = DomUtils.findChildElement(root, "dependencyManagement");

 * <p>
 * This class now uses the standard {@link java.util.Base64} implementation
 * instead of a custom implementation, providing better security and performance.
 * The API remains backward compatible with previous versions.
 * </p>
 *
 * @author higa
 */
public abstract class Base64Util {

    /**
     * Do not instantiate.
     */
    protected Base64Util() {
    }

        // Assert
        assertSame(mocked, ex.getCause(), "Mocked cause should be preserved");
        verifyNoInteractions(mocked);
    }

    // Reflection-based check: ensure serialVersionUID remains the declared constant
    @Test
    @DisplayName("serialVersionUID matches declared constant")
    void serialVersionUID_hasExpectedValue() throws Exception {
        // Arrange

        // Session starts with usage count > 0, so acquire/release cycles maintain usage
        assertTrue(session.isInUse(), "Session should be in use initially");

        // Test acquire/release cycles (session remains in use due to initial transport acquire)
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
            session.acquire();
            assertTrue(session.isInUse(), "Session should be in use after acquire " + i);

    void lookup_returns_empty_for_unknown_codes(int unknownCode) {
        // Invalid inputs: codes not present should yield no message
        // Guard to ensure test remains valid if constants change in future
        for (int c : WinError.WINERR_CODES) {
            assertNotEquals(unknownCode, c, "Chosen unknown code unexpectedly clashes with a known code");
        }

            // Refreshing the original must not clear the clone's cached subject
            orig.refresh();
            // Clone should retain its cached Subject
            assertSame(copySubj, copy.getSubject(), "Clone should retain its cached Subject");
        } else {
            // If JAAS is not configured and getSubject() returns null, verify cloning still works

    withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
      fileSystem.write(outputFile) {
        importResults.writeOut(this)
      }
    }

  /**
   * These assertions ensure the [PublicSuffixDatabase] remains correct. The specification is
   * very flexible regarding wildcard rules, but this flexibility is not something currently used
   * in practice. To simplify the implementation, we've avoided implementing the flexible rules in

    // explicitly remove the existing value
    cache.asMap().computeIfPresent(1, (key, value) -> null);
    assertThat(notifications).hasSize(1);
    CacheTesting.checkEmpty(cache);

    // ensure no zombie entry remains
    cache.asMap().computeIfPresent(1, (key, value) -> null);
    assertThat(notifications).hasSize(1);
    CacheTesting.checkEmpty(cache);
  }

  public void testComputeIfPresent_error() {

useful?

Erasure code protects data from multiple drives failure, unlike RAID or replication. For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects...