* could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use

    val handshake = makeRequest(client)

    assertThat(handshake.cipherSuite).isIn(*expectedModernTls12CipherSuites.toTypedArray())

    // Probably something like
    // TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
    // TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
    // TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
    // TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
    // TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384

      // Enable ALPN.
      sslParameters.applicationProtocols = Platform.alpnProtocolNames(protocols).toTypedArray()

      sslSocket.sslParameters = sslParameters
    } catch (iae: IllegalArgumentException) {
      // probably java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid input to toASCII from IDN.toASCII
      throw IOException("Android internal error", iae)
    }
  }

  @SuppressSignatureCheck
  companion object {

 * and initializing on first use.
 *
 * We use this because eager classpath checks cause confusion and excessive logging in Android,
 * and we can't rely on classnames after proguard, so are probably best served by falling through
 * to a situation of trying our least likely noisiest options.
 */
class DeferredSocketAdapter(
  private val socketAdapterFactory: Factory,
) : SocketAdapter {

import java.io.File;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Android-incompatible tests for {@link FileBackedOutputStream}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // Finalization probably just doesn't happen fast enough?
@NullUnmarked
public class FileBackedOutputStreamAndroidIncompatibleTest extends IoTestCase {

  public void testFinalizeDeletesFile() throws Exception {

   * {@code co.uk}, {@code google.invalid}, or {@code blogspot.com}.
   *
   * <p>This method can be used to determine whether it will probably be possible to set cookies on
   * the domain, though even that depends on individual browsers' implementations of cookie
   * controls. See <a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt">RFC 2109</a> for details.
   *

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

   *     href="https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220#Removed:-The-extension-mechanism">deprecated</a> in
   *     Java 8 and removed in Java 9. We do not plan to remove this API from Guava, but if you are
   *     using it, it is probably not doing what you want.
   */
  @Deprecated
  JAVA_EXT_DIRS("java.ext.dirs"),

  /** Operating system name. */
  OS_NAME("os.name"),

  /** Operating system architecture. */
  OS_ARCH("os.arch"),

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *