// Test evaluate method with numeric values
    @Test
    public void test_evaluate_withNumericValues() {
        String template = "Result: ${number1} + ${number2} = ${sum}";
        Map<String, Object> paramMap = new HashMap<>();
        paramMap.put("number1", 10);
        paramMap.put("number2", 20);
        paramMap.put("sum", 30);

        Object result = scriptEngine.evaluate(template, paramMap);

    Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
    // Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeError2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
    Optional<? extends Number> first = numbers.first();
    // Number value = first.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test

    Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1);
    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> unusedA = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> unusedB = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> unusedC = objects.compound(numbers);

    Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1);
    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> unusedA = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> unusedB = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> unusedC = objects.compound(numbers);

   * keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * <p>You may also consider the equivalent {@code
   * MultimapBuilder.hashKeys(expectedKeys).hashSetValues(expectedValuesPerKey).build()}, which
   * provides more control over the underlying data structure.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys

   * numbers of keys and values without resizing.
   *
   * <p>You may also consider the equivalent {@code
   * MultimapBuilder.hashKeys(expectedKeys).arrayListValues(expectedValuesPerKey).build()}, which
   * provides more control over the underlying data structure.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys

        private final List<E> parent;

        /** The total number of pages available. */
        protected int allPageCount;

        /** The total number of records across all pages. */
        protected int allRecordCount;

        /** The number of records per page. */
        protected int pageSize;

        /** The current page number (1-based). */
        protected int currentPageNumber;

   *
   * @param host the host string to parse. Must not contain a port number.
   * @param port a port number from [0..65535]
   * @return if parsing was successful, a populated HostAndPort object.
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code host} contains a port number, or {@code port} is out
   *     of range.
   */
  public static HostAndPort fromParts(String host, int port) {

    }

    /**
     * Formats a number using the specified pattern and user's locale.
     *
     * @param value the number to format
     * @param pattern the number format pattern
     * @return formatted number string
     */
    public static String formatNumber(final long value, final String pattern) {

   * keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * <p>You may also consider the equivalent {@code
   * MultimapBuilder.hashKeys(expectedKeys).hashSetValues(expectedValuesPerKey).build()}, which
   * provides more control over the underlying data structure.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys