* MockWebServer. In cases where logic is particularly tricky, we use unit tests. This class makes
 * it easy to get sample values to use in such tests.
 *
 * This class is pretty fast and loose with default values: it attempts to provide values that are
 * well-formed, but doesn't guarantee values are internally consistent. Callers must take care to
 * configure the factory when sample values impact the correctness of the test.

Previously, there was no formalization of property naming; only loose conventions were followed.
While these conventions served relatively well in practice, they created gaps, resulting in a loss of uniformity in some cases and leaving friction in the process of naming new properties.

### Terminology

`+h}T=!h.trim(),p+=H+`

            return packagedArtifactFile;
        }

        if (!hasBeenPackagedDuringThisSession(project)) {
            // fallback to loose class files only if artifacts haven't been packaged yet
            // and only for plain old jars. Not war files, not ear files, not anything else.
            return determineBuildOutputDirectoryForArtifact(project, artifact);

    // Can't call with too loose a key:
    // transformEntries(map1, transformer);
    // transformEntries(map2, transformer);
    // transformEntries(map3, transformer);

    // Can't call with too loose a value:
    // transformEntries(map1, transformer);
    // transformEntries(map4, transformer);
    // transformEntries(map7, transformer);
  }

 * and forbids implementations or extensions with parallel edges. If you need parallel edges, use
 * {@link Network}. (You can use a positive {@code Integer} edge value as a loose representation of
 * edge multiplicity, but the {@code *degree()} and mutation methods will not reflect your
 * interpretation of the edge value as its multiplicity.)
 *
 * <h3>Building a {@code ValueGraph}</h3>
 *

be <i>exact</i> or <i>loose</i>.
As unification recursively descends a composite type structure,
the matching mode used for elements of the type, the <i>element matching mode</i>,
remains the same as the matching mode except when two types are unified for
<a href="#Assignability">assignability</a> (<code>≡<sub>A</sub></code>):
in this case, the matching mode is <i>loose</i> at the top level but

   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public int remove(@Nullable Object element, int occurrences) {
    if (occurrences == 0) {
      return count(element);
    }

   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public int remove(@Nullable Object element, int occurrences) {
    if (occurrences == 0) {
      return count(element);
    }

        .testEquals();
  }

  private interface Loser<E extends Throwable> {
    void lose() throws E;
  }

  public <T extends Loser<AssertionError>> void testMethod_exceptionTypes()
      throws NoSuchMethodException {
    Method failMethod = Loser.class.getMethod("lose");
    Invokable<T, ?> invokable = new TypeToken<T>(getClass()) {}.method(failMethod);