* sample of code points to detect Unicode control characters commonly used in binary file
 * signatures.
 *
 * @param codePointLimit the number of code points to read in order to make a decision.
 */
internal fun BufferedSource.isProbablyUtf8(codePointLimit: Long = Long.MAX_VALUE): Boolean {
  try {
    val peek = peek()
    for (i in 0 until codePointLimit) {
      if (peek.exhausted()) {
        break

        verifyNoInteractions(mockDir);
    }

    /**
     * Interaction with dependency: implementation can use directory's methods to make decisions.
     * Tests a filter that uses directory path information.
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("filter can use SmbFile directory for decision logic")
    void filterCanUseSmbFileForDecision() throws Exception {
        // Stub the getPath method to return a specific value

        assertTrue(ex.getMessage().contains("Server does not support NTLM authentication"));

        // Verify the decision consulted the configuration
        // getConfig() is called twice: once in Kerb5Authenticator and once in NtlmPasswordAuthenticator
        verify(tc, times(2)).getConfig();

          }

          // We have a task to execute when we complete the loop.
          else -> {
            readyTask = candidate
          }
        }
      }

      // Implement the decision.
      when {
        // We have a task ready to go. Get ready.
        readyTask != null -> {
          beforeRun(readyTask)

          // Also start another thread if there's more work or scheduling to do.

  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node
  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?

  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node
  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?

     * int.
     */
    checkNonNegative("a", a);
    checkNonNegative("b", b);
    if (a == 0) {
      // 0 % b == 0, so b divides a, but the converse doesn't hold.
      // BigInteger.gcd is consistent with this decision.
      return b;
    } else if (b == 0) {
      return a; // similar logic
    }
    /*
     * Uses the binary GCD algorithm; see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_GCD_algorithm. This is

- CEL authorizer checks no longer raise runtime errors. Calls to "check" will always return a decision object and the authorization error (if any) can be accessed within expressions using the new decision methods "errored" and "error". ([#118804](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/118804), [@benluddy](https://github.com/benluddy)) [SIG API Machinery]

        data[7] = (byte) (high >> 24);

        PacDataInputStream pdis = createInputStream(data);
        Date date = pdis.readFiletime();
        assertNotNull(date);
        // Allow for a small difference due to precision loss
        assertEquals(time / 1000, date.getTime() / 1000);

        // Test with null date (0x7fffffff ffffffff)

        assertEquals(domainInfo.name.maximum_length / 2, decodedInfo.name.buffer.length);

        // Verify SID
        assertNotNull(decodedInfo.sid);
        assertEquals(domainInfo.sid.revision, decodedInfo.sid.revision);
        assertEquals(domainInfo.sid.sub_authority_count, decodedInfo.sid.sub_authority_count);
    }

    @Test
    void testLsarDomainInfoEncodeDecodeWithNulls() throws NdrException {