if startsWithSupported, condFound := startsWithConds[policy.Key]; condFound {
			// Check if the current condition supports starts-with operator
			if op == policyCondStartsWith && !startsWithSupported {
				return fmt.Errorf("Invalid according to Policy: Policy Condition failed")
			}
			// Check if current policy condition is satisfied
			if !checkPolicyCond(op, formValues.Get(formCanonicalName), policy.Value) {

		}
	}
}

// TestHTTPStatsRaceCondition tests the race condition fix for HTTPStats.
// This test specifically addresses the race between:
// - Write operations via updateStats.
// - Read operations via toServerHTTPStats(false).
func TestRaulStatsRaceCondition(t *testing.T) {
	httpStats := newHTTPStats()
	// Simulate the concurrent scenario from the original race condition:
	// Multiple HTTP request handlers updating stats concurrently,

		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand != nil &&
		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand.Operand.Left != nil &&
		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand.Operand.Left.Left != nil &&
		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand.Operand.Left.Left.Primary != nil &&

   * Causes this thread to call the named method, and asserts that this thread thereby waits on the
   * given condition-like object. The lock-like object must have a method equivalent to {@link
   * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},
   * except that the method parameter must accept whatever condition-like object is passed into this
   * method.
   */

   * Causes this thread to call the named method, and asserts that this thread thereby waits on the
   * given condition-like object. The lock-like object must have a method equivalent to {@link
   * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},
   * except that the method parameter must accept whatever condition-like object is passed into this
   * method.
   */

	CINC	NV, R2, R3                                       // ERROR "invalid condition"
	CINVW	AL, R2, R3                                       // ERROR "invalid condition"
	CINV	NV, R2, R3                                       // ERROR "invalid condition"
	CNEG	AL, R2, R3                                       // ERROR "invalid condition"

	for _, ac := range e.And {
		result.combine(ac.analyze(s))
	}
	return result
}

func (e *AndCondition) analyze(s *Select) (result qProp) {
	for _, ac := range e.Condition {
		result.combine(ac.analyze(s))
	}
	return result
}

func (e *Condition) analyze(s *Select) (result qProp) {
	if e.Operand != nil {
		result = e.Operand.analyze(s)
	} else {
		result = e.Not.analyze(s)
	}
	return result
}

            file existence, etc.), Maven now supports a powerful condition-based activation
            through the {@code condition} field. This new mechanism allows for more flexible
            and expressive profile activation rules.</p>

            <h2>Condition Syntax</h2>

            <p>The condition is specified as a string expression that can include various

		// Test Case 3: if-match with wrong ETag
		// Even if the ETag doesn't match, we should still get read quorum error
		// because we can't read the object to check the condition.
		opts := ObjectOptions{
			UserDefined: map[string]string{
				xhttp.IfMatch: "wrong-etag",
			},
			CheckPrecondFn: func(oi ObjectInfo) bool {
				// Precondition fails if ETag doesn't match

	t.Run("complete multipart with if-none-match and read quorum failure", func(t *testing.T) {
		// Try to complete the multipart upload with if-none-match
		// This should fail because we can't verify the condition due to read quorum failure
		opts := ObjectOptions{
			UserDefined: map[string]string{
				xhttp.IfNoneMatch: "*",
			},
			CheckPrecondFn: func(oi ObjectInfo) bool {
				return oi.ETag != ""
			},
		}