repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  // Condition.await() tests

  /*
   * RE: the WaitNotInLoop warnings:
   *
   * Our tests for awaitUninterruptibly are written under the assumption that no spurious wakeups
   * occur except for those produced by awaitUninterruptibly itself in response to interrupts.
   *

    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  // Condition.await() tests

  /*
   * RE: the WaitNotInLoop warnings:
   *
   * Our tests for awaitUninterruptibly are written under the assumption that no spurious wakeups
   * occur except for those produced by awaitUninterruptibly itself in response to interrupts.
   *

import java.util.Date;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition;

/** Forwarding wrapper around a {@code Condition}. */
@SuppressWarnings("WaitNotInLoop") // We are just delegating; _our user_ must loop.
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
abstract class ForwardingCondition implements Condition {
  abstract Condition delegate();

  @Override

   * wakeup</a>. This means that resulting wait is not "uninterruptible" in the normal sense of
   * {@link Uninterruptibles}. Still, this method allows callers to write <a
   * href="https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/WaitNotInLoop">the standard, required loop for waiting on a {@code
   * Condition}</a> but without the need to handle interruption.
   *
   * @return {@code false} if the waiting time detectably elapsed before return from the method