if !selectAST.Expression.All &&
		len(selectAST.Expression.Expressions) == 1 &&
		len(selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And) == 1 &&
		len(selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition) == 1 &&
		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand != nil &&
		selectAST.Expression.Expressions[0].Expression.And[0].Condition[0].Operand.Operand.Left != nil &&

	if e.All {
		return qProp{isRowFunc: true}
	}

	for _, ex := range e.Expressions {
		result.combine(ex.analyze(s))
	}
	return result
}

func (e *AliasedExpression) analyze(s *Select) qProp {
	return e.Expression.analyze(s)
}

func (e *Expression) analyze(s *Select) (result qProp) {
	for _, ac := range e.And {
		result.combine(ac.analyze(s))
	}
	return result
}

                PrimaryExpr TypeAssertion |
                PrimaryExpr Arguments .

Selector      = "." identifier .
Index         = "[" Expression [ "," ] "]" .
Slice         = "[" [ Expression ] ":" [ Expression ] "]" |
                "[" [ Expression ] ":" Expression ":" Expression "]" .
TypeAssertion = "." "(" Type ")" .
Arguments     = "(" [ ( ExpressionList | Type [ "," ExpressionList ] ) [ "..." ] [ "," ] ] ")" .
</pre>

		p.errorf("expected g or R0 through R15; found %s", name)
		return 0
	}
	return uint16(reg)
}

// Note: There are two changes in the expression handling here
// compared to the old yacc/C implementations. Neither has
// much practical consequence because the expressions we
// see in assembly code are simple, but for the record:
//
// 1) Evaluation uses uint64; the old one used int64.

	castInt       = "INT"
	castInteger   = "INTEGER"
	castString    = "STRING"
	castFloat     = "FLOAT"
	castDecimal   = "DECIMAL"
	castNumeric   = "NUMERIC"
	castTimestamp = "TIMESTAMP"
)

func (e *Expression) castTo(r Record, castType string, tableAlias string) (res *Value, err error) {
	v, err := e.evalNode(r, tableAlias)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	switch castType {
	case castInt, castInteger:

	errCmpInvalidBoolOperator = errors.New("invalid comparison operator for boolean arguments")
)

// Value represents a value of restricted type reduced from an
// expression represented by an ASTNode. Only one of the fields is
// non-nil.
//
// In cases where we are fetching data from a data source (like csv),
// the type may not be determined yet. In these cases, a byte-slice is
// used.

		}
	}
}

// SelectObjectContentHandler - GET Object?select
// ----------
// This implementation of the GET operation retrieves object content based
// on an SQL expression. In the request, along with the sql expression, you must
// also specify a data serialization format (JSON, CSV) of the object.
func (api objectAPIHandlers) SelectObjectContentHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {

<h3 id="constants">Constants</h3>

<p>
Although the assembler takes its guidance from the Plan 9 assemblers,
it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>

    for enabling/disabling v2 control flow.
*   Enable v2 control flow as part of `tf.enable_v2_behavior()` and
    `TF2_BEHAVIOR=1`.
*   AutoGraph translates Python control flow into TensorFlow expressions,
    allowing users to write regular Python inside `tf.function`-decorated
    functions. AutoGraph is also applied in functions used with `tf.data`,
    `tf.distribute` and `tf.keras` APIS.