## `fastapi-slim`

⚠️ Do not install this package. ⚠️

This package, `fastapi-slim`, does nothing other than depend on `fastapi`.

All the functionality has been integrated into `fastapi`.

The only reason this package exists is as a migration path for old projects that used to depend on `fastapi-slim`, so that they can get the latest version of `fastapi`.

     * @param slim the limit index in the source array
     * @return the decoded String
     * @throws IOException if a decoding error occurs
     */
    public static String dec_utf8(final byte[] src, int si, final int slim) throws IOException {
        final char[] uni = new char[slim - si];
        int ui, ch;

        for (ui = 0; si < slim && (ch = src[si++] & 0xFF) != 0; ui++) {

     * @param slim the limit index in the source array
     * @return the decoded String
     * @throws IOException if a decoding error occurs
     */
    public static String dec_utf8(final byte[] src, int si, final int slim) throws IOException {
        final char[] uni = new char[slim - si];
        int ui, ch;

        for (ui = 0; si < slim && (ch = src[si++] & 0xFF) != 0; ui++) {

     * @param doff the offset in the destination array
     */
    public void update(final byte[] src, int soff, final int slen, final byte[] dst, int doff) {
        int slim = soff + slen;
        while (soff < slim) {
            i = i + 1 & 0xff;
            j = j + s[i] & 0xff;
            final byte t = s[i];
            s[i] = s[j];
            s[j] = t;

    void tryClose() {
        synchronized (LOCK) {

            /* Yes, there is the potential to drop packets
             * because we might close the socket during a
             * request. However the chances are slim and the
             * retry code should ensure the overall request
             * is serviced. The alternative complicates things
             * more than I think is worth it.
             */

        synchronized (this.LOCK) {

            /*
             * Yes, there is the potential to drop packets
             * because we might close the socket during a
             * request. However the chances are slim and the
             * retry code should ensure the overall request
             * is serviced. The alternative complicates things
             * more than I think is worth it.
             */

## Dependencies

### Added
- cel.dev/expr: v0.15.0
- github.com/antlr4-go/antlr/v4: [v4.13.0](https://github.com/antlr4-go/antlr/tree/v4.13.0)
- github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3: [v3.0.0](https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/tree/v3.0.0)
- gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4: v4.12.0

### Changed
- cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata: v0.2.3 → v0.3.0
- cloud.google.com/go/firestore: v1.11.0 → v1.12.0

- github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference: [v0.20.1 → v0.20.2](https://github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference/compare/v0.20.1...v0.20.2)
- github.com/go-task/slim-sprig: [348f09d → 52ccab3](https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/compare/348f09d...52ccab3)
- github.com/gofrs/uuid: [v4.0.0+incompatible → v4.4.0+incompatible](https://github.com/gofrs/uuid/compare/v4.0.0...v4.4.0)

* 👷 Fix CI, do not attempt to publish `fastapi-slim`. PR [#14958](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14958) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo).

## Dependencies

### Added
- github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3: [v3.8.0](https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3/tree/v3.8.0)
- github.com/go-task/slim-sprig: [348f09d](https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/tree/348f09d)
- github.com/gogo/googleapis: [v1.4.1](https://github.com/gogo/googleapis/tree/v1.4.1)
- github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4: [v4.2.0](https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4/tree/v4.2.0)