*/
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFluentFutureCatchingSpecialization<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.

 * different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

package com.google.common.graph;

import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Supertype for {@link Graphs}, containing the old signatures of methods whose signatures we've
 * changed. This provides binary compatibility for users who compiled against the old signatures.
 */
abstract class GraphsBridgeMethods {

  @SuppressWarnings("PreferredInterfaceType")
  public static <N> Graph<N> transitiveClosure(Graph<N> graph) {
    return Graphs.transitiveClosure(graph);

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,

  // For now, we'll keep the standard ones and allow modules to add more
  androidSignature(library("signature-android-apilevel21")) { artifact { type = "signature" } }
  jvmSignature(library("codehaus-signature-java18")) { artifact { type = "signature" } }

  "lintChecks"(library("androidx-lint-gradle"))
}

configure<com.android.build.api.dsl.Lint> {
  xmlReport = true
  checkDependencies = true
}

package org.codelibs.fess.suggest.index.operations;

/**
 * Encapsulates the context parameters commonly passed to content indexing operations.
 * Groups together index name, field configuration, and bad words to simplify method signatures.
 */
public class ContentIndexingContext {

    private final String index;
    private final String[] supportedFields;
    private final String[] tagFieldNames;
    private final String roleFieldName;

     *
     * @return whether signatures are supported but not required
     * @throws SmbException if an error occurs checking signing status
     */
    boolean isSigningOptional() throws SmbException;

    /**
     * Checks if message signing is mandatory for this connection.
     *
     * @return whether signatures are enforced from either side

import okio.BufferedSource

/**
 * Returns true if the body in question probably contains human-readable text. Uses a small
 * sample of code points to detect Unicode control characters commonly used in binary file
 * signatures.
 *
 * @param codePointLimit the number of code points to read in order to make a decision.
 */
internal fun BufferedSource.isProbablyUtf8(codePointLimit: Long = Long.MAX_VALUE): Boolean {
  try {
    val peek = peek()

class AddressTest extends BaseTest {

    @Mock
    private CIFSContext mockContext;

    @Mock
    private Address mockAddress;

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Address interface should define correct method signatures")
    void testInterfaceContract() {
        // Given
        Address address = mockAddress;

        // When & Then - verify interface methods exist and can be called
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {

        }
        final byte[] signature = digest();
        for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
            if (signature[i] != data[offset + SmbConstants.SIGNATURE_OFFSET + i]) {
                if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
                    log.debug("signature verification failure"); //$NON-NLS-1$
                    log.debug("Expect: " + Hexdump.toHexString(signature, 0, 8));