hubiésemos
hubieseis
hubiesen
habiendo
habido
habida
habidos
habidas
soy
eres
es
somos
sois
son
sea
seas
seamos
seáis
sean
seré
serás
será
seremos
seréis
serán
sería
serías
seríamos
seríais
serían
era
eras
éramos
erais
eran
fui
fuiste
fue
fuimos
fuisteis
fueron
fuera
fueras
fuéramos

houveremos
houverão
houveria
houveríamos
houveriam
sou
somos
são
era
éramos
eram
fui
foi
fomos
foram
fora
fôramos
seja
sejamos
sejam
fosse
fôssemos
fossem
for
formos
forem
serei
será
seremos
serão
seria
seríamos
seriam
tenho
tem
temos
tém
tinha
tínhamos
tinham
tive
teve
tivemos

"hubierais", "hubieran", "hubiese", "hubieses", "hubiésemos", "hubieseis", "hubiesen", "habiendo", "habido", "habida", "habidos", "habidas", "soy", "eres", "es", "somos", "sois", "son", "sea", "seas", "seamos", "seáis", "sean", "seré", "serás", "será", "seremos", "seréis", "serán", "sería", "serías", "seríamos", "seríais", "serían", "era", "eras", "éramos", "erais", "eran", "fui", "fuiste", "fue", "fuimos", "fuisteis", "fueron", "fuera", "fueras", "fuéramos", "fuerais", "fueran", "fuese", "fueses", "fuésemos",...

   * a duration in order to call a legacy API which requires a {@code long, TimeUnit} pair.
   */
  static long toNanosSaturated(Duration duration) {
    // Using a try/catch seems lazy, but the catch block will rarely get invoked (except for
    // durations longer than approximately +/- 292 years).
    try {
      return duration.toNanos();
    } catch (ArithmeticException tooBig) {

  @SuppressWarnings({"GoodTime-ApiWithNumericTimeUnit", "GoodTime-DecomposeToPrimitive"})
  @IgnoreJRERequirement
  static long toNanosSaturated(Duration duration) {
    // Using a try/catch seems lazy, but the catch block will rarely get invoked (except for
    // durations longer than approximately +/- 292 years).
    try {
      return duration.toNanos();
    } catch (ArithmeticException tooBig) {

    this.validator = validator;
    this.errorMessage = errorMessage;
  }

  // Override hashCode() to access delegate directly (so that it doesn't trigger the validate() call
  // via delegate()); it seems inappropriate to throw ISE on this method.
  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {

  }

  @Override
  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentHashMap() {
    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection