*   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard
 *       configurations, and there's always the potential that something will go wrong. It
 *       <i>probably</i> won't, since the deps are needed only in tests (and maybe someday in
 *       testlib), but why bother?

   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use

    val handshake = makeRequest(client)

    assertThat(handshake.cipherSuite).isIn(*expectedModernTls12CipherSuites.toTypedArray())

    // Probably something like
    // TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
    // TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
    // TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
    // TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
    // TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384

      // Enable ALPN.
      sslParameters.applicationProtocols = Platform.alpnProtocolNames(protocols).toTypedArray()

      sslSocket.sslParameters = sslParameters
    } catch (iae: IllegalArgumentException) {
      // probably java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid input to toASCII from IDN.toASCII
      throw IOException("Android internal error", iae)
    }
  }

  @SuppressSignatureCheck
  companion object {

 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3.logging.internal

import java.io.EOFException
import okio.Buffer

/**
 * Returns true if the body in question probably contains human readable text. Uses a small
 * sample of code points to detect unicode control characters commonly used in binary file
 * signatures.
 */
fun Buffer.isProbablyUtf8(): Boolean {
  try {

/*
 * @Ignore affects the Android test runner (and only the Android test runner): It respects JUnit 4
 * annotations even on JUnit 3 tests.
 *
 * TODO(b/225350400): Remove @Ignore, which doesn't seem like it should be necessary and probably
 * soon won't be.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@Ignore
public final class MyTester extends AbstractTester<@Nullable Void> {
  static int timesTestClassWasRun = 0;

 * and initializing on first use.
 *
 * We use this because eager classpath checks cause confusion and excessive logging in Android,
 * and we can't rely on classnames after proguard, so are probably best served by falling through
 * to a situation of trying our least likely noisiest options.
 */
class DeferredSocketAdapter(
  private val socketAdapterFactory: Factory,
) : SocketAdapter {

  SIP_HASH24(Hashing.sipHash24()),
  FARMHASH_FINGERPRINT_64(Hashing.farmHashFingerprint64()),

  // Hash functions found in //javatests for comparing against current implementation of CityHash.
  // These can probably be removed sooner or later.
  ;

  private final HashFunction hashFunction;

  HashFunctionEnum(HashFunction hashFunction) {
    this.hashFunction = hashFunction;
  }

  HashFunction getHashFunction() {

import java.io.File;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Android-incompatible tests for {@link FileBackedOutputStream}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // Finalization probably just doesn't happen fast enough?
@NullUnmarked
public class FileBackedOutputStreamAndroidIncompatibleTest extends IoTestCase {

  public void testFinalizeDeletesFile() throws Exception {

   * {@code co.uk}, {@code google.invalid}, or {@code blogspot.com}.
   *
   * <p>This method can be used to determine whether it will probably be possible to set cookies on
   * the domain, though even that depends on individual browsers' implementations of cookie
   * controls. See <a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt">RFC 2109</a> for details.
   *