private interface HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureSubinterface extends HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private static class HierarchyFixtureParent implements HierarchyFixtureSubinterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureSubinterface extends HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private static class HierarchyFixtureParent implements HierarchyFixtureSubinterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

 * with {@link #where} and types are resolved using {@link #resolveType}.
 *
 * <p>Note that usually type mappings are already implied by the static type hierarchy (for example,
 * the {@code E} type variable declared by class {@code List} naturally maps to {@code String} in
 * the context of {@code class MyStringList implements List<String>}). In such case, prefer to use

            identifiers.put(ident, method);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return ImmutableList.copyOf(identifiers.values());
  }

  /** Global cache of classes to their flattened hierarchy of supertypes. */
  private static final LoadingCache<Class<?>, ImmutableSet<Class<?>>> flattenHierarchyCache =
      CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
          .weakKeys()
          .build(
              CacheLoader.from(

#### Figure 2 - KMS key hierarchy

```
                                                          CMK (master key)
                                                           |

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework

 * with {@link #where} and types are resolved using {@link #resolveType}.
 *
 * <p>Note that usually type mappings are already implied by the static type hierarchy (for example,
 * the {@code E} type variable declared by class {@code List} naturally maps to {@code String} in
 * the context of {@code class MyStringList implements List<String>}). In such case, prefer to use

	} `json:"xl"`
}

// formatErasureV3 struct is same as formatErasureV2 struct except that formatErasureV3.Erasure.Version is "3" indicating
// the simplified multipart backend which is a flat hierarchy now.
// In .minio.sys/multipart we have:
// sha256(bucket/object)/uploadID/[xl.meta, part.1, part.2 ....]
type formatErasureV3 struct {
	formatMetaV1
	Erasure struct {

The *path operation* itself also declares a scope, `"items"`, so this will also be in the list of `security_scopes.scopes` passed to `get_current_user`.

Here's how the hierarchy of dependencies and scopes looks like:

* The *path operation* `read_own_items` has:
    * Required scopes `["items"]` with the dependency:
    * `get_current_active_user`:

* Even dependencies can have dependencies, creating a hierarchy or **"graph" of dependencies**.
* All **automatically handled** by the framework.
* All the dependencies can require data from requests and **augment the path operation** constraints and automatic documentation.