token: ${{ secrets.JENKINS_TOKEN }}
        base: ${{ github.event.inputs.release_branch }}
        branch: ${{ github.event.inputs.release_branch }}-${{ steps.cherrypick.outputs.SHORTSHA }}
        reviewers: learning-to-play
        body: |

* During code reviews that introduce new APIs, reviewers need to be mindful that all new properties are implemented with lazy types.

      with:
        title: Update the RBE images to the latest container versions
        committer: TensorFlow Release Automation <******@****.***>
        token: ${{ secrets.JENKINS_TOKEN }}
        reviewers: mihaimaruseac,learning-to-play,nitins17
        body: |
          This PR was created by a GitHub Actions workflow to update all the SIG Build-based RBE containers to the most recent containers. See:

**2. Valid?**

-   If the PR passes all the quality checks then we go ahead and assign a
    reviewer.
-   If the PR didn't meet the validation criteria, we request for additional
    changes to be made to PR to pass quality checks and send it back or on a
    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.

# update CODE and DATA below, and then run
#
#	./update.bash -commit
#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files
# in the CL match the update.bash in the CL.

    logging.info(f"Checking PR: #{pr.number}")
    pr_labels = list(pr.get_labels())
    pr_label_by_name = {label.name: label for label in pr_labels}
    reviews = list(pr.get_reviews())
    review_by_user: dict[str, PullRequestReview] = {}
    for review in reviews:
        if review.user.login in review_by_user:
            stored_review = review_by_user[review.user.login]
            if review.submitted_at >= stored_review.submitted_at:

representative at an online or offline event.

## Enforcement

Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
.
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.

All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
reporter of any incident.

## Enforcement Guidelines

    title: Svix - Webhooks as a service
    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/svix.svg
  - url: https://www.codacy.com/?utm_source=github&utm_medium=sponsors&utm_id=pioneers
    title: Take code reviews from hours to minutes
    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/codacy.png
  - url: https://www.stainlessapi.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=referral
    title: Stainless | Generate best-in-class SDKs

    bazel test $TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS //tensorflow/tools/api/tests:api_compatibility_test
    echo "You have to re-generate the TF API goldens and have the API changes reviewed."
    echo "Look at the instructions for ':api_compatibility_test -- --update_goldens=True'"
}

# See b/279852433 (internal).
# TODO(b/279852433) Replace deps(//tensorflow/...) with deps(//...)

		return "", "", fmt.Errorf("not a VS path: %s", path)
	}
	return ss[3], ss[2], nil
}

// getIstioVirtualServicePathForSvcFromRoute returns something like "/apis/networking/v1alpha3/namespaces/default/virtual-service/reviews"
func getIstioVirtualServicePathForSvcFromRoute(cd *configdump.Wrapper, svc corev1.Service, port int32) (string, error) {
	sPort := strconv.Itoa(int(port))