} finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {

    } finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {

again.

[individual CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/about/google-individual
[corporate CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/about/google-corporate

## Building and Testing

The most reliable way to build and test Guava is:

```shell
./mvnw clean install
```

If you want to run a single test, you'll need to pass multiple flags because

# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# ==============================================================================
name: Reusable Build
on:
  workflow_call:
    inputs:
      runner:
        description: 'Which runner should the workflow run on?'
        required: true
        type: string
      tfci:

      throws IOException {
    Readable readable =
        asReader ? getChunkedReader(input, chunk) : getChunkedReadable(input, chunk);
    LineReader r = new LineReader(readable);
    List<String> lines = new ArrayList<>();
    String line;
    while ((line = r.readLine()) != null) {
      lines.add(line);
    }
    return lines;
  }

  // Returns a Readable that is *not* a Reader.

  #  uses: ./.github/workflows/build-reusable.yml
  #  with:
  #    runner: 'linux-x86-n2-16'
  #    tfci: 'py313,linux_x86,rbe'

  #build-and-test-linux-x86-cuda:
  #  uses: ./.github/workflows/build-reusable.yml
  #  with:
  #    runner: 'linux-x86-n4-32'
  #    tfci: 'py313,linux_x86_cuda'

  #build-and-test-arm64:
  #  uses: ./.github/workflows/build-reusable.yml
  #  with:
  #    runner: 'linux-arm64-c4a-16'

          the Derivative Works; and

      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
import java.util.stream.Stream;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A readable source of characters, such as a text file. Unlike a {@link Reader}, a {@code
 * CharSource} is not an open, stateful stream of characters that can be read and closed. Instead,

   *       {@link NullPointerException}.
   *   <li>Code that chains multiple predicates together (especially negations) may be more readable
   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.
   *   <li>This method's name conflicts with Kotlin's {@code in} operator.
   * </ul>
   *

   *       {@link NullPointerException}.
   *   <li>Code that chains multiple predicates together (especially negations) may be more readable
   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.
   *   <li>This method's name conflicts with Kotlin's {@code in} operator.
   * </ul>
   *