assertTrue(filter.accept(mockDir, "document.txt"), "Should accept .txt files in the correct path");
        assertFalse(filter.accept(mockDir, "image.png"), "Should reject non-.txt files");
        assertFalse(filter.accept(mockDir, null), "Should reject null names");

        // Verify getPath was called three times (once for each accept call)
        verify(mockDir, times(3)).getPath();
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(mockDir);

            } catch (final Exception ignore) {}
        }
        latch.countDown();
    }

    /**
     * Rejects the deferred computation with the given throwable.
     * @param t The throwable.
     */
    public void reject(final Throwable t) {
        final ArrayList<Consumer<Throwable>> executeCallbacks;
        synchronized (Deferred.this) {

	}

	// If we have too many waiting, reject this at once.
	if l.waitMutex.Load() > lockMutexWaitLimit {
		l.locksOverloaded.Add(1)
		return false, nil
	}
	// Wait for mutex
	defer l.getMutex()()
	if ctx.Err() != nil {
		return false, ctx.Err()
	}
	if !l.canTakeLock(args.Resources...) {
		// Not all locks can be taken on resources,
		// reject it completely.
		return false, nil
	}

        // negative size -> reject
        when(smbFile.length()).thenReturn(-1L);
        assertFalse(filter.accept(smbFile), "Negative size should be rejected");
        verify(smbFile, times(1)).length();

        // zero size -> reject
        reset(smbFile);
        when(smbFile.length()).thenReturn(0L);
        assertFalse(filter.accept(smbFile), "Zero size should be rejected");
        verify(smbFile, times(1)).length();

Your API now has the power to control its own <abbr title="This is a joke, just in case. It has nothing to do with cookie consents, but it's funny that even the API can now reject the poor cookies. Have a cookie. 🍪">cookie consent</abbr>. 🤪🍪

You can use Pydantic's model configuration to `forbid` any `extra` fields:

{* ../../docs_src/cookie_param_models/tutorial002_an_py39.py hl[10] *}

			success: false,
		},
		// duplicate 'expiration' reject
		{

        assertTrue(key.isZero());
        assertArrayEquals(zeroBytes, key.getKey());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should reject null key")
    void testNullKey() {
        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> new Smb2LeaseKey(null));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should reject wrong size key")
    void testWrongSizeKey() {
        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> new Smb2LeaseKey(new byte[15]));

  public void testDelegateRejection() {
    AtomicInteger numCalls = new AtomicInteger();
    AtomicBoolean reject = new AtomicBoolean(true);
    SequentialExecutor executor =
        new SequentialExecutor(
            new Executor() {
              @Override
              public void execute(Runnable r) {
                if (reject.get()) {
                  throw new RejectedExecutionException();
                }

                    deferred.reject(new SuggesterException("Search failure. Failed shards num:" + searchResponse.getFailedShards()));
                } else {
                    deferred.resolve(createResponse(searchResponse));
                }
            }

            @Override
            public void onFailure(final Exception e) {
                deferred.reject(e);
            }
        });
    }

			// Verify if date headers are set, if not reject the request
			amzDate, errCode := parseAmzDateHeader(r)
			if errCode != ErrNone {
				if ok {
					tc.FuncName = "handler.Auth"
					tc.ResponseRecorder.LogErrBody = true
				}

				// All our internal APIs are sensitive towards Date
				// header, for all requests where Date header is not
				// present we will reject such clients.