public class CustomSizeTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    // Test field with CustomSize annotation for testing
    @CustomSize(minKey = "test.min", maxKey = "test.max")
    private String testField;

    // Test field with only minKey
    @CustomSize(minKey = "test.min.only")
    private String testFieldMinOnly;

    // Test field with only maxKey
    @CustomSize(maxKey = "test.max.only")

    public void initialize(final CustomSize constraintAnnotation) {
        final FessConfig fessConfig = ComponentUtil.getFessConfig();
        final String minKey = constraintAnnotation.minKey();
        if (StringUtil.isNotBlank(minKey)) {
            min = Integer.parseInt(fessConfig.get(minKey));
        }
        final String maxKey = constraintAnnotation.maxKey();
        if (StringUtil.isNotBlank(maxKey)) {

            }

            @Override
            public Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() {
                return new Class[0];
            }

            @Override
            public String minKey() {
                return "";
            }

            @Override
            public String maxKey() {
                return "";
            }
        };
    }

	}

	for _, v := range vectors {
		got, err := formatPAXRecord(v.inKey, v.inVal)
		ok := (err == nil)
		if ok != v.ok {
			if v.ok {
				t.Errorf("formatPAXRecord(%q, %q): got format failure, want success", v.inKey, v.inVal)
			} else {
				t.Errorf("formatPAXRecord(%q, %q): got format success, want failure", v.inKey, v.inVal)
			}
		}
		if got != v.want {

				})
			case policyCondContentLength:
				minLen, err := toInteger(condt[1])
				if err != nil {
					return parsedPolicy, err
				}

				maxLen, err := toInteger(condt[2])
				if err != nil {
					return parsedPolicy, err
				}

				parsedPolicy.Conditions.ContentLengthRange = contentLengthRange{
					Min:   minLen,
					Max:   maxLen,
					Valid: true,
				}
			default:

* **Minder bugs**: Verminder ongeveer 40% van de door mensen (ontwikkelaars) veroorzaakte fouten. *
* **Intuïtief**: Buitengewoon goede ondersteuning voor editors. <abbr title="ook bekend als automatisch aanvullen, automatisch aanvullen, IntelliSense">Overal automische code aanvulling</abbr>. Minder tijd kwijt aan debuggen.

The user of your API (an external developer) will create an invoice in your API with a POST request.

Then your API will (let's imagine):

* Send the invoice to some customer of the external developer.
* Collect the money.
* Send a notification back to the API user (the external developer).
    * This will be done by sending a POST request (from *your API*) to some *external API* provided by that external developer (this is the "callback").

* **Egyszerű**: Egyszerű tanulásra és használatra tervezve. Kevesebb dokumentáció olvasással töltött idő.
* **Rövid**: Kód duplikáció minimalizálása. Több funkció minden paraméter deklarálásával. Kevesebb hiba.
* **Robosztus**: Production ready kód. Automatikus interaktív dokumentáció val.

If you are paying for 3 servers but you are using only a little bit of their RAM and CPU, you are probably **wasting money** 💸, and probably **wasting server electric power** 🌎, etc.

In that case, it could be better to have only 2 servers and use a higher percentage of their resources (CPU, memory, disk, network bandwidth, etc).