var inconsistent int
	for i, meta := range metaArr {
		if disks[i] == nil {
			// Assuming offline drives as inconsistent,
			// to be safe and fallback to original
			// distribution order.
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}
		if !meta.IsValid() {
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}
		if meta.XLV1 != fi.XLV1 {
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}

    assertEquals(Country.class, bimap.valueType());
  }

  public void testIterationOrder() {
    // The enum orderings are alphabetical, leading to the bimap and its inverse
    // having inconsistent iteration orderings.
    Map<Currency, Country> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, Country.CANADA,
            Currency.PESO, Country.CHILE,
            Currency.FRANC, Country.SWITZERLAND);

    assertEquals(Country.class, bimap.valueType());
  }

  public void testIterationOrder() {
    // The enum orderings are alphabetical, leading to the bimap and its inverse
    // having inconsistent iteration orderings.
    Map<Currency, Country> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, Country.CANADA,
            Currency.PESO, Country.CHILE,
            Currency.FRANC, Country.SWITZERLAND);

- Some Unformatted - format all and return success.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json) - return failure
- Any unrecognized disks - return failure

Some disks are offline and we have quorum.
-----------------
- Some unformatted - format all and return success,
  treat disks offline as corrupted.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json)

        assertTrue(endLatch.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS), "All threads should complete");
        executor.shutdown();

        // Then - Session should be in consistent state
        // The double-check pattern should prevent inconsistent cleanup
        assertTrue(releaseCount.get() > 0 || acquireCount.get() > 0, "Release and acquire counts should be processed");
    }

    /**

        // When/Then
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {
            PropertyConfiguration testConfig = new PropertyConfiguration(props);
            // Configuration should handle inconsistent min/max versions
            assertNotNull(testConfig.getMinimumVersion());
            assertNotNull(testConfig.getMaximumVersion());
        });
    }

    @Test

            // Both non-null - should be same instance
            assertSame(first, second, "Second getSubject should return same cached instance as first");
        } else {
            fail("Inconsistent behavior: first=" + first + ", second=" + second);
        }

        // Third call should return the same cached Subject instance
        Subject third = auth.getSubject();

   * use the copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code predicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals. (See {@link
   * Iterables#filter(Iterable, Class)} for related functionality.)
   *

	// Check whether uid is still active.
	resource, ok := l.lockUID[formatUUID(args.UID, 0)]
	if !ok {
		return false, nil
	}
	idx := 0
	for {
		lris, ok := l.lockMap[resource]
		if !ok {
			// Inconsistent. Delete UID.
			delete(l.lockUID, formatUUID(args.UID, idx))
			return idx > 0, nil
		}
		now := UTCNow()
		for i := range lris {
			if lris[i].UID == args.UID {
				lris[i].TimeLastRefresh = now.UnixNano()

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L] < [1L << 63]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(long[], long[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.