"application/conference-info+xml",
				"application/cpl+xml",
				"application/csta+xml",
				"application/cstadata+xml",
				"application/cu-seeme",
				"application/cybercash",
				"application/davmount+xml",
				"application/dca-rft",
				"application/dec-dx",
				"application/dialog-info+xml",
				"application/dicom",
				"application/dita+xml",
				"application/dita+xml;format=map",

	    <magic>
        <match value="&lt;MPD" type="string" offset="0"/>
      </magic>
      <sub-class-of type="application/xml"/>
	</mime-type>
  <mime-type type="application/davmount+xml">
    <glob pattern="*.davmount"/>
  </mime-type>
  <mime-type type="application/x-dbf">
    <!-- this looks unique/precise. It isn't. False positives are common. Keep priority low. -->
    <magic priority="40">

	MOVWU	(R5)(R4.UXTW<<3), R10                            // ERROR "invalid index shift amount"
	MOVWU	(R5)(R4<<1), R10                                 // ERROR "invalid index shift amount"
	MOVB	(R5)(R4.SXTW<<5), R10                            // ERROR "invalid index shift amount"
	MOVH	R5, (R6)(R2<<3)                                  // ERROR "invalid index shift amount"

  /**
   * Test that verifies the resource leak fix for <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/5756">Issue #5756</a>.
   *
   * <p>This test covers a scenario where we write a smaller amount of data first, then write a
   * large amount that crosses the threshold (transitioning from "not at threshold" to "over the
   * threshold"). (We then write some more afterward.) This differs from the existing

  /**
   * Test that verifies the resource leak fix for <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/5756">Issue #5756</a>.
   *
   * <p>This test covers a scenario where we write a smaller amount of data first, then write a
   * large amount that crosses the threshold (transitioning from "not at threshold" to "over the
   * threshold"). (We then write some more afterward.) This differs from the existing

        this.crawlerRunning = crawlerRunning;
    }

    /**
     * Represents a rule for controlling crawler intervals.
     * Each rule defines a time range, applicable days, and delay amount.
     */
    public static class IntervalRule {
        /** Starting hour of the interval */
        protected int fromHours;

        /** Starting minute of the interval */
        protected int fromMinutes;

		tok := p.next()
		ext = tok.String()
	}
	if p.peek() == lex.LSH {
		// parses left shift amount applied after extension: <<Amount
		p.get(lex.LSH)
		tok := p.get(scanner.Int)
		amount, err := strconv.ParseInt(tok.String(), 10, 16)
		if err != nil {
			p.errorf("parsing left shift amount: %s", err)
		}
		num = int16(amount)
	} else if p.peek() == '[' {
		// parses an element: [Index]
		p.get('[')

  }

  /**
   * Sends the given method call to this thread.
   *
   * @throws TimeoutException if this thread does not accept the request within a reasonable amount
   *     of time
   */
  private void sendRequest(String methodName, Object... arguments) throws Exception {
    if (!requestQueue.offer(new Request(methodName, arguments), TIMEOUT_MILLIS, MILLISECONDS)) {

  }

  /**
   * Sends the given method call to this thread.
   *
   * @throws TimeoutException if this thread does not accept the request within a reasonable amount
   *     of time
   */
  private void sendRequest(String methodName, Object... arguments) throws Exception {
    if (!requestQueue.offer(new Request(methodName, arguments), TIMEOUT_MILLIS, MILLISECONDS)) {

    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */