@SuppressWarnings({"removal", "Finalize"}) // b/487687332
          @Override
          protected void finalize() {
            latch.countDown();
          }
        };
    unused = null; // Hint to the JIT that unused is unreachable
    GcFinalization.await(latch);
    assertEquals(0, latch.getCount());
  }

  public void testAwaitDone_future() {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> future = SettableFuture.create();

          @SuppressWarnings({"removal", "Finalize"}) // b/487687332
          @Override
          protected void finalize() {
            latch.countDown();
          }
        };
    unused = null; // Hint to the JIT that unused is unreachable
    GcFinalization.await(latch);
    assertEquals(0, latch.getCount());
  }

  public void testAwaitDone_future() {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> future = SettableFuture.create();

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

    int expectedValuesPerKey = ImmutableCollection.Builder.DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY;

    /**
     * Creates a new builder. The returned builder is equivalent to the builder generated by {@link
     * ImmutableMultimap#builder}.
     */
    public Builder() {}

    /** Creates a new builder with a hint for the number of distinct keys. */
    Builder(int expectedKeys) {
      if (expectedKeys > 0) {

    canonical = null; // Hint to the JIT that canonical is unreachable

    GcFinalization.awaitClear(signal);
    assertThat(pool.intern(not)).isSameInstanceAs(not);
  }

  private static final class MyInt {
    private final int i;

    MyInt(int i) {
      this.i = i;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return i;
    }

    @Override

    canonical = null; // Hint to the JIT that canonical is unreachable

    GcFinalization.awaitClear(signal);
    assertThat(pool.intern(not)).isSameInstanceAs(not);
  }

  private static final class MyInt {
    private final int i;

    MyInt(int i) {
      this.i = i;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return i;
    }

    @Override

You can declare a response to be the `Union` of two or more types, that means, that the response would be any of them.

It will be defined in OpenAPI with `anyOf`.

To do that, use the standard Python type hint [`typing.Union`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Union):

/// note

  pymdownx.tilde: null
  pymdownx.blocks.admonition:
    types:
    - note
    - attention
    - caution
    - danger
    - error
    - tip
    - hint
    - warning
    - info
    - check
  pymdownx.blocks.details: null
  pymdownx.blocks.tab:
    alternate_style: true
  mdx_include: null
  markdown_include_variants: null
extra:
  social:

									<i class="fa fa-paper-plane" aria-hidden="true"></i>
								</button>
							</div>
							<div class="input-footer">
								<span class="input-hint"><la:message key="labels.chat_input_hint" /></span>
								<span class="char-counter"><span id="charCount">0</span> / 4000</span>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>