assert resp.status_code == 200
    assert resp.json() == {"status": "ok"}
    assert resp.headers.get("X-Custom") == "modified"


# Tests for Request type hint with Depends
def test_request_with_depends_annotated():
    """Request type hint should work in dependency chain."""
    app = FastAPI()

    def extract_request_info(request: Request) -> dict:
        return {
            "path": request.url.path,

          @SuppressWarnings({"removal", "Finalize"}) // b/487687332
          @Override
          protected void finalize() {
            latch.countDown();
          }
        };
    unused = null; // Hint to the JIT that unused is unreachable
    GcFinalization.await(latch);
    assertEquals(0, latch.getCount());
  }

  public void testAwaitDone_future() {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> future = SettableFuture.create();

          @SuppressWarnings({"removal", "Finalize"}) // b/487687332
          @Override
          protected void finalize() {
            latch.countDown();
          }
        };
    unused = null; // Hint to the JIT that unused is unreachable
    GcFinalization.await(latch);
    assertEquals(0, latch.getCount());
  }

  public void testAwaitDone_future() {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> future = SettableFuture.create();

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

    int expectedValuesPerKey = ImmutableCollection.Builder.DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY;

    /**
     * Creates a new builder. The returned builder is equivalent to the builder generated by {@link
     * ImmutableMultimap#builder}.
     */
    public Builder() {}

    /** Creates a new builder with a hint for the number of distinct keys. */
    Builder(int expectedKeys) {
      if (expectedKeys > 0) {

    canonical = null; // Hint to the JIT that canonical is unreachable

    GcFinalization.awaitClear(signal);
    assertThat(pool.intern(not)).isSameInstanceAs(not);
  }

  private static final class MyInt {
    private final int i;

    MyInt(int i) {
      this.i = i;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return i;
    }

    @Override

    canonical = null; // Hint to the JIT that canonical is unreachable

    GcFinalization.awaitClear(signal);
    assertThat(pool.intern(not)).isSameInstanceAs(not);
  }

  private static final class MyInt {
    private final int i;

    MyInt(int i) {
      this.i = i;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return i;
    }

    @Override

        "5XX",
    }:
        return True
    current_status_code = int(status_code)
    return not (current_status_code < 200 or current_status_code in {204, 205, 304})


def get_path_param_names(path: str) -> set[str]:
    return set(re.findall("{(.*?)}", path))


_invalid_args_message = (
    "Invalid args for response field! Hint: "
    "check that {type_} is a valid Pydantic field type. "

  }

  static <E extends Enum<E>> Class<E> getDeclaringClassOrObjectForJ2cl(E e) {
    return e.getDeclaringClass();
  }

  static int reduceIterationsIfGwt(int iterations) {
    return iterations;
  }

  static int reduceExponentIfGwt(int exponent) {
    return exponent;
  }

  private Platform() {}