assertEquals(5, boolResult.should().size());
    }

    // Test complex query with all clause types
    @Test
    public void test_convertBooleanQuery_complexQuery() {
        BooleanQuery.Builder boolQueryBuilder = new BooleanQuery.Builder();

        // Add multiple clauses of each type
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {

		db.cacheStore.Store(preparedStmtDBKey, preparedStmt)
		db.ConnPool = preparedStmt
	}

	db.Statement = &Statement{
		DB:       db,
		ConnPool: db.ConnPool,
		Context:  context.Background(),
		Clauses:  map[string]clause.Clause{},
	}

	if err == nil && !config.DisableAutomaticPing {
		if pinger, ok := db.ConnPool.(interface{ Ping() error }); ok {
			err = pinger.Ping()
			if err != nil {

					}

					rnnColumn := clause.Column{Name: "gorm_preload_rnn"}
					sql := "ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ? ?)"
					vars := []interface{}{partitionBy}
					if orderBy, ok := q.db.Statement.Clauses["ORDER BY"]; ok {
						vars = append(vars, orderBy)
					} else {
						vars = append(vars, clause.Clause{Name: "ORDER BY", Expression: clause.OrderBy{
							Columns: []clause.OrderByColumn{{Column: clause.PrimaryColumn, Desc: true}},

	updateCallback.Clauses = config.UpdateClauses

	rowCallback := db.Callback().Row()
	rowCallback.Register("gorm:row", RowQuery)
	rowCallback.Clauses = config.QueryClauses

	rawCallback := db.Callback().Raw()
	rawCallback.Register("gorm:raw", RawExec)
	rawCallback.Clauses = config.QueryClauses

// Package clause provides the clause interface and common clause implementations for GORM.
package clause

// Interface clause interface
type Interface interface {
	Name() string
	Build(Builder)
	MergeClause(*Clause)
}

// ClauseBuilder clause builder, allows to customize how to build clause
type ClauseBuilder func(Clause, Builder)

type Writer interface {
	WriteByte(byte) error
	WriteString(string) (int, error)
}

# Clases como dependencias { #classes-as-dependencies }

Antes de profundizar en el sistema de **Inyección de Dependencias**, vamos a mejorar el ejemplo anterior.

## Un `dict` del ejemplo anterior { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

En el ejemplo anterior, estábamos devolviendo un `dict` de nuestra dependencia ("dependable"):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

for equality.
</p>

<p>
In a case or default clause, the last non-empty statement
may be a (possibly <a href="#Labeled_statements">labeled</a>)
<a href="#Fallthrough_statements">"fallthrough" statement</a> to
indicate that control should flow from the end of this clause to
the first statement of the next clause.
Otherwise control flows to the end of the "switch" statement.

# Classes as Dependencies { #classes-as-dependencies }

Before diving deeper into the **Dependency Injection** system, let's upgrade the previous example.

## A `dict` from the previous example { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

In the previous example, we were returning a `dict` from our dependency ("dependable"):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

# Classes como Dependências { #classes-as-dependencies }

Antes de nos aprofundarmos no sistema de **Injeção de Dependência**, vamos melhorar o exemplo anterior.

## `dict` do exemplo anterior { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

No exemplo anterior, nós retornávamos um `dict` da nossa dependência ("injetável"):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

# Классы как зависимости { #classes-as-dependencies }

Прежде чем углубиться в систему **Внедрения Зависимостей**, давайте обновим предыдущий пример.

## `dict` из предыдущего примера { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

В предыдущем примере мы возвращали `dict` из нашей зависимости («dependable»):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

Но затем мы получаем `dict` в параметре `commons` *функции-обработчика пути*.