*/
  private void assertSuppressed(Suppression... expected) {
    assertEquals(ImmutableList.copyOf(expected), suppressor.suppressions);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Just use addSuppressed+getSuppressed now that we can rely on it.
  /** Suppressor that records suppressions. */
  private static class TestSuppressor implements Closer.Suppressor {

    private final List<Suppression> suppressions = new ArrayList<>();

    @Override

errors.result_size_exceeded = Aucun autre résultat ne peut être affiché.
errors.target_file_does_not_exist = Le fichier {0} n'existe pas.
errors.failed_to_delete_file = Échec de la suppression du fichier {0}.
errors.docid_not_found = ID de document non trouvé. Cause : {0}
errors.document_not_found = L'URL de l'ID de document est introuvable. Cause : {0}

        super(cause);
    }

    /**
     * Constructs a new FessSystemException with the specified detail message and suppression settings.
     *
     * @param message the detail message describing the exception
     * @param enableSuppression whether suppression is enabled or disabled
     * @param writableStackTrace whether the stack trace should be writable
     */

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

        super(cause);
    }

    /**
     * Constructs a new ExtractException with the specified detail message,
     * suppression enabled or disabled, and writable stack trace enabled or disabled.
     *
     * @param message the detail message.
     * @param enableSuppression whether or not suppression is enabled or disabled.
     * @param writableStackTrace whether or not the stack trace should be writable.
     */

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

      }
    }
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return elements.length;
  }

  // We're careful to put only E instances into the array in the mainline.
  // (In the backport, we don't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.)
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  @Override
  public UnmodifiableIterator<E> iterator() {
    return (UnmodifiableIterator<E>) Iterators.forArray(elements);
  }

  @Override

   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {
    return suppressing(asList(methods));
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Collection<Method> methods) {
    suppressedTests.addAll(methods);
    return self();
  }

  public Set<Method> getSuppressedTests() {

   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {
    return suppressing(asList(methods));
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Collection<Method> methods) {
    suppressedTests.addAll(methods);
    return self();
  }

  public Set<Method> getSuppressedTests() {