"berauek", "bere", "berori", "beroriek", "beste", "bezala", "da", "dago", "dira", "ditu", "du", "dute", "edo", "egin", "ere", "eta", "eurak", "ez", "gainera", "gu", "gutxi", "guzti", "haiei", "haiek", "haietan", "hainbeste", "hala", "han", "handik", "hango", "hara", "hari", "hark", "hartan", "hau", "hauei", "hauek", "hauetan", "hemen", "hemendik", "hemengo", "hi", "hona", "honek", "honela", "honetan", "honi", "hor", "hori", "horiei", "horiek", "horietan", "horko", "horra", "horrek", "horrela", "horretan",...

        pw.println("                                 kiwi, mango");

        java.util.Properties p = new java.util.Properties();
        p.load(new StringReader(sw.toString()));
        Object o24 = p.getProperty("fruits");
        assertEquals("apple, banana, pear, cantaloupe, watermelon, kiwi, mango", o24);

        MavenProperties props = new MavenProperties();

Betrachten wir die deklarierten Parameter:

* Obwohl diese Funktion selbst eine Abhängigkeit ist („Dependable“, etwas hängt von ihr ab), deklariert sie auch eine andere Abhängigkeit („Dependant“, sie hängt von etwas anderem ab).
    * Sie hängt von `query_extractor` ab und weist den von diesem zurückgegebenen Wert dem Parameter `q` zu.
* Sie deklariert außerdem ein optionales `last_query`-Cookie, ein `str`.

          TimeoutsToUse.FINITE,
          isBoolean(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG);
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
          TimeoutsToUse.INFINITE,
          isGuarded(method) ? Outcome.HANG : (isTryEnter(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG));
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

   * @param terminationTimeout how long to wait for the executor to finish before terminating the
   *     JVM
   * @return an unmodifiable version of the input which will not hang the JVM
   * @since 28.0 (but only since 33.4.0 in the Android flavor)
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  public static ExecutorService getExitingExecutorService(

   * don't hang around during other tests.)
   */
  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    try {
      Thread.class.getMethod("stop").invoke(this);
      join();
    } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {
      // stop() threw or did not exist. Don't join() the thread, which might hang forever.
    }

    if (uncaughtThrowable != null) {

* etc.

En estos casos, normalmente devolverías un **código de estado HTTP** en el rango de **400** (de 400 a 499).

Esto es similar a los códigos de estado HTTP 200 (de 200 a 299). Esos códigos de estado "200" significan que de alguna manera hubo un "éxito" en el request.

Los códigos de estado en el rango de 400 significan que hubo un error por parte del cliente.

   * don't hang around during other tests.)
   */
  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    try {
      Thread.class.getMethod("stop").invoke(this);
      join();
    } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {
      // stop() threw or did not exist. Don't join() the thread, which might hang forever.
    }

    if (uncaughtThrowable != null) {