Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

   *     accepts a cause: Users of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null
   *     cause. At the moment, you can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit
   *     {@code null} cause. Note, however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents
   *     anyone from calling {@link #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a
   *     constructor that omits the cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

// type of AbstractTensor in their context (do not pass an MlirTensor to a
// GraphContext and vice-versa).
class TracingTensorHandle : public AbstractTensorHandle {
 protected:
  explicit TracingTensorHandle(AbstractTensorHandleKind kind)
      : AbstractTensorHandle(kind) {}

 public:
  // For LLVM style RTTI.
  static bool classof(const AbstractTensorHandle* ptr) {

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(c, Ordering.explicit(42, 5))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(5, 42))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(42))
        .testEquals();
    reserializeAndAssert(c);
  }

  public void testExplicit_sortingExample() {
    Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 0, 9);
    List<Integer> list = asList(0, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(c, Ordering.explicit(42, 5))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(5, 42))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(42))
        .testEquals();
    reserializeAndAssert(c);
  }

  public void testExplicit_sortingExample() {
    Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 0, 9);
    List<Integer> list = asList(0, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);

 * into itself leading to a stack overflow.
 *
 * A side effect of using @Typed is that it translates to explicit bindings in the container.
 * So instead of binding the component under a 'wildcard' key it is now bound with an explicit
 * key. Since this is a default component this will be a plain binding of ModelProcessor to
 * this implementation type, ie. no hint/name.
 *

                + "If the class is better tested explicitly, you can add %s() to %sTest",
            description,
            cls,
            explicitTestNames.get(0),
            cls.getName());
    return new AssertionError(message, e);
  }

  /**
   * Finds the classes not ending with a test suffix and not covered by an explicit test whose name
   * is {@code explicitTestNames}.
   */

    /**
     * Gets the identifiers of those profiles that should be activated by explicit demand.
     *
     * @return The identifiers of those profiles to activate, never {@code null}.
     */
    List<String> getActiveProfileIds();

    /**
     * Gets the identifiers of those profiles that should be deactivated by explicit demand.
     *
     * @return The identifiers of those profiles to deactivate, never {@code null}.