print(user_dict)
```

we would get a Python `dict` with:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

#### Unpacking a `dict` { #unpacking-a-dict }

If we take a `dict` like `user_dict` and pass it to a function (or class) with `**user_dict`, Python will "unpack" it. It will pass the keys and values of the `user_dict` directly as key-value arguments.

print(user_dict)
```

Python의 `dict`가 다음과 같이 출력됩니다:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

#### `dict` 언패킹(Unpacking)

`user_dict`와 같은 `dict`를 함수(또는 클래스)에 `**user_dict`로 전달하면, Python은 이를 "언팩(unpack)"합니다. 이 과정에서 `user_dict`의 키와 값을 각각 키-값 인자로 직접 전달합니다.

따라서, 위에서 생성한 `user_dict`를 사용하여 다음과 같이 작성하면:

```Python
UserInDB(**user_dict)

You might want to have some predefined responses that apply to many *path operations*, but you want to combine them with custom responses needed by each *path operation*.

For those cases, you can use the Python technique of "unpacking" a `dict` with `**dict_to_unpack`:

```Python
old_dict = {
    "old key": "old value",
    "second old key": "second old value",
}
new_dict = {**old_dict, "new key": "new value"}
```

import jcifs.Decodable;
import jcifs.Encodable;
import jcifs.internal.SMBProtocolDecodingException;
import jcifs.internal.util.SMBUtil;

/**
 * Represents a byte range for SMB1 locking and unlocking operations.
 *
 * This class encapsulates the information about a byte range that needs
 * to be locked or unlocked, including the process ID, offset, and length.
 *
 * @author mbechler
 */

in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly
documented (and with an implementation available to the public in
source code form), and must require no special password or key for
unpacking, reading or copying.

  7. Additional Terms.

  "Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this
License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions.

      throw ProtocolException("Control frame must be less than ${PAYLOAD_BYTE_MAX}B.")
    }

    if (isMasked) {
      // Read the masking key as bytes so that they can be used directly for unmasking.
      source.readFully(maskKey!!)
    }
  }

  @Throws(IOException::class)
  private fun readControlFrame() {
    if (frameLength > 0L) {
      source.readFully(controlFrameBuffer, frameLength)

Dans ces cas, vous pouvez utiliser la technique Python "d'affection par décomposition" (appelé _unpacking_ en anglais) d'un `dict` avec `**dict_to_unpack` :

```Python
old_dict = {
    "old key": "old value",
    "second old key": "second old value",
}
new_dict = {**old_dict, "new key": "new value"}
```

#
#   Important for patching:
#
#   (2) This script targets any POSIX shell, so it avoids extensions provided
#       by Bash, Ksh, etc; in particular arrays are avoided.
#
#       The "traditional" practice of packing multiple parameters into a
#       space-separated string is a well documented source of bugs and security
#       problems, so this is (mostly) avoided, by progressively accumulating

	"strconv"
	"sync"
	"sync/atomic"
	"time"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/dsync"
)

// Reject new lock requests immediately when this many are queued
// for the local lock mutex.
// We do not block unlocking or maintenance, but they add to the count.
// The limit is set to allow for bursty behavior,
// but prevent requests to overload the server completely.
// Rejected clients are expected to retry.
const lockMutexWaitLimit = 1000

  //
  // I probably can't remember all the reasons (it's possible you
  // could find them in the code review archives), but here are a few:
  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have