assertTrue(filter.accept(mockDir, "document.txt"), "Should accept .txt files in the correct path");
        assertFalse(filter.accept(mockDir, "image.png"), "Should reject non-.txt files");
        assertFalse(filter.accept(mockDir, null), "Should reject null names");

        // Verify getPath was called three times (once for each accept call)
        verify(mockDir, times(3)).getPath();
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(mockDir);

        @DisplayName("should reject unsupported model versions")
        void shouldRejectUnsupportedModelVersions(String version) {
            assertFalse(ModelVersionUtils.isValidModelVersion(version));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("provideInvalidVersions")
        @DisplayName("should reject invalid version formats")

            receivedMessage.set(error.getMessage());
        });

        // First reject
        deferred.reject(new RuntimeException("first"));
        // Second reject (should be ignored)
        deferred.reject(new RuntimeException("second"));
        // Third reject (should be ignored)
        deferred.reject(new RuntimeException("third"));

        Thread.sleep(100);

        return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            if (img.complete && img.naturalHeight !== 0) {
                resolve();
            } else {
                img.addEventListener('load', () => {
                    if (img.naturalHeight !== 0) {
                        resolve();
                    } else {
                        reject();
                    }
                });

            } catch (final Exception ignore) {}
        }
        latch.countDown();
    }

    /**
     * Rejects the deferred computation with the given throwable.
     * @param t The throwable.
     */
    public void reject(final Throwable t) {
        final ArrayList<Consumer<Throwable>> executeCallbacks;
        synchronized (Deferred.this) {

	}

	// If we have too many waiting, reject this at once.
	if l.waitMutex.Load() > lockMutexWaitLimit {
		l.locksOverloaded.Add(1)
		return false, nil
	}
	// Wait for mutex
	defer l.getMutex()()
	if ctx.Err() != nil {
		return false, ctx.Err()
	}
	if !l.canTakeLock(args.Resources...) {
		// Not all locks can be taken on resources,
		// reject it completely.
		return false, nil
	}

        assertTrue(key.isZero());
        assertArrayEquals(zeroBytes, key.getKey());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should reject null key")
    void testNullKey() {
        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> new Smb2LeaseKey(null));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should reject wrong size key")
    void testWrongSizeKey() {
        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> new Smb2LeaseKey(new byte[15]));

			success: false,
		},
		// duplicate 'expiration' reject
		{

        // negative size -> reject
        when(smbFile.length()).thenReturn(-1L);
        assertFalse(filter.accept(smbFile), "Negative size should be rejected");
        verify(smbFile, times(1)).length();

        // zero size -> reject
        reset(smbFile);
        when(smbFile.length()).thenReturn(0L);
        assertFalse(filter.accept(smbFile), "Zero size should be rejected");
        verify(smbFile, times(1)).length();

Your API now has the power to control its own <dfn title="This is a joke, just in case. It has nothing to do with cookie consents, but it's funny that even the API can now reject the poor cookies. Have a cookie. 🍪">cookie consent</dfn>. 🤪🍪

You can use Pydantic's model configuration to `forbid` any `extra` fields:

{* ../../docs_src/cookie_param_models/tutorial002_an_py310.py hl[10] *}