* 2^n}, its memory usage is only {@code O(n)}. When the power set is constructed, the input set
   * is merely copied. Only as the power set is iterated are the individual subsets created, and
   * these subsets themselves occupy only a small constant amount of memory.
   *
   * @param set the set of elements to construct a power set from

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import java.io.DataOutput;
import java.io.IOException;

/**
 * An extension of {@code DataOutput} for writing to in-memory byte arrays; its methods offer
 * identical functionality but do not throw {@link IOException}.
 *
 * @author Jayaprabhakar Kadarkarai
 * @since 1.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

	rootAccess                  bool
	syncEvents                  bool
	objectMaxVersions           int64
}

const (
	cgroupV1MemLimitFile = "/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.limit_in_bytes"
	cgroupV2MemLimitFile = "/sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max"
)

func cgroupMemLimit() (limit uint64) {
	buf, err := os.ReadFile(cgroupV2MemLimitFile)
	if err != nil {
		buf, err = os.ReadFile(cgroupV1MemLimitFile)
	}

 * lock, but also maximizes memory footprint. On the other extreme, one could use a single lock for
 * all tasks, which minimizes memory footprint but also minimizes concurrency. Instead of choosing
 * either of these extremes, {@code Striped} allows the user to trade between required concurrency
 * and memory footprint. For example, if a set of tasks are CPU-bound, one could easily create a

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import java.io.DataOutput;
import java.io.IOException;

/**
 * An extension of {@code DataOutput} for writing to in-memory byte arrays; its methods offer
 * identical functionality but do not throw {@link IOException}.
 *
 * @author Jayaprabhakar Kadarkarai
 * @since 1.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

 *       <i>deeply</i> immutable.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Performance notes</h4>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is

 * [Flipper](https://fbflipper.com/): A desktop debugging platform for mobile developers.
 * [Fresco](https://github.com/facebook/fresco): An Android library for managing images and the memory they use.
 * [Glide](https://github.com/bumptech/glide): An image loading and caching library for Android focused on smooth scrolling.

### Memory per Process { #memory-per-process }

Now, when the program loads things in memory, for example, a machine learning model in a variable, or the contents of a large file in a variable, all that **consumes a bit of the memory (RAM)** of the server.

If you need to perform heavy background computation and you don't necessarily need it to be run by the same process (for example, you don't need to share memory, variables, etc), you might benefit from using other bigger tools like <a href="https://docs.celeryq.dev" class="external-link" target="_blank">Celery</a>.

    server.enqueue(MockResponse().setSocketPolicy(SocketPolicy.DISCONNECT_DURING_REQUEST_BODY))
    // Limit the size of the request body that the server holds in memory to an arbitrary
    // 3.5 MBytes so this test can pass on devices with little memory.
    server.bodyLimit = 7 * 512 * 1024
    val connection = server.url("/").toUrl().openConnection() as HttpURLConnection
    connection.setRequestMethod("POST")