* Gets the array of supported authentication mechanisms
     * @return the mechanisms array
     */
    public ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] getMechanisms() {
        return this.mechanisms;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the array of supported authentication mechanisms
     * @param mechanisms the mechanisms to set
     */
    public void setMechanisms(final ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] mechanisms) {
        this.mechanisms = mechanisms;

        @DisplayName("Various mechanism combinations round-trip correctly")
        void testMechanismCombinations(ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] mechanisms) throws Exception {
            NegTokenInit init = new NegTokenInit(mechanisms, 0, null, null);
            byte[] encoded = init.toByteArray();
            NegTokenInit parsed = new NegTokenInit(encoded);

            if (mechanisms == null) {

    /**
     * Checks whether the specified security mechanism is supported.
     * @param mechanism the security mechanism OID to check
     * @return whether the specified mechanism is supported
     */
    boolean isSupported(ASN1ObjectIdentifier mechanism);

    /**
     * Checks whether the specified mechanism is the preferred mechanism.
     * @param selectedMech the selected mechanism OID

///

## Other models { #other-models }

You can now get the current user directly in the *path operation functions* and deal with the security mechanisms at the **Dependency Injection** level, using `Depends`.

And you can use any model or data for the security requirements (in this case, a Pydantic model `User`).

 */

package jcifs.dcerpc;

import jcifs.dcerpc.ndr.NdrBuffer;

/**
 * Interface for providing security services for DCE/RPC communications.
 * This interface abstracts authentication and encryption mechanisms.
 */
public interface DcerpcSecurityProvider {

    /**
     * Wraps outgoing DCERPC message data for security protection
     * @param outgoing the buffer containing data to be wrapped

    CIFSContext tc;

    @Mock
    Configuration config;

    private static byte[] spnegoInitWithMechs(ASN1ObjectIdentifier... mechs) {
        // Build a minimal SPNEGO NegTokenInit containing the provided mechanisms
        NegTokenInit tok = new NegTokenInit(mechs, 0, null, null);
        return tok.toByteArray();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("createContext: rejects NetBIOS/short host names")

 *
 * This interface defines the contract for SSO authentication providers that can be
 * integrated with Fess. Implementations handle specific SSO protocols like SAML,
 * OAuth, SPNEGO, or other authentication mechanisms. Each authenticator is responsible
 * for obtaining login credentials, resolving user information, and managing SSO
 * lifecycle operations like logout and metadata exchange.
 */
public interface SsoAuthenticator {

   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or
   * both of these mechanisms, so they will be unaffected.
   */
  @Param({"0", "1", "12"})
  int otherEntriesInDataStructure;

  final List<ClassValue<?>> retainedReferencesToOtherClassValues = new ArrayList<>();

  @BeforeExperiment

 * handled internally to the <code>jcifs.smb</code> package.
 * <p>
 * This class is a wrapper for both {@link jcifs.netbios.NbtAddress}
 * and {@link java.net.InetAddress}. The name resolution mechanisms
 * used will systematically query all available configured resolution
 * services including WINS, broadcasts, DNS, and LMHOSTS. See
 * <a href="../../resolver.html">Setting Name Resolution Properties</a>

		return errors.New("multiple authentication mechanisms are provided")
	case conf.AccountKey == "" && (conf.SPAuth.TenantID == "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientID == "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientSecret == ""):
		return errors.New("no authentication mechanism was provided")
	}

	if conf.Bucket == "" {
		return errors.New("no bucket name was provided")
	}

	return nil