"durch", "ein", "eine", "einem", "einen", "einer", "eines", "einig", "einige", "einigem", "einigen", "einiger", "einiges", "einmal", "er", "ihn", "ihm", "es", "etwas", "euer", "eure", "eurem", "euren", "eurer", "eures", "für", "gegen", "gewesen", "hab", "habe", "haben", "hat", "hatte", "hatten", "hier", "hin", "hinter", "ich", "mich", "mir", "ihr", "ihre", "ihrem", "ihren", "ihrer", "ihres", "euch", "im", "in", "indem", "ins", "ist", "jede", "jedem", "jeden", "jeder", "jedes", "jene", "jenem", "jenen", "jener",...

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Since annotations have some reusability issues that force copy and paste all over the place, it's
 * worth having a test to ensure that all our Feature enums have their annotations correctly set up.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
public class FeatureEnumTest extends TestCase {

            caughtSpecific = true;
        } catch (RuntimeException e) {
            caughtRuntime = true;
        }

        assertTrue("Should have caught DictionaryExpiredException", caughtSpecific);
        assertFalse("Should not have caught as RuntimeException", caughtRuntime);
    }

    public void test_rethrow() {
        // Test rethrowing the exception

        valve1.setShowReport(true);
        valve1.setShowServerInfo(true);

        // valve2 should still have default values
        assertFalse("valve2 should have independent ShowReport setting", valve2.isShowReport());
        assertFalse("valve2 should have independent ShowServerInfo setting", valve2.isShowServerInfo());
    }

    public void test_toggleSettingsMultipleTimes() {

        return true
      }
    }

    // If we have a routes left, use 'em.
    if (routeSelection?.hasNext() == true) return true

    // If we haven't initialized the route selector yet, assume it'll have at least one route.
    val localRouteSelector = routeSelector ?: return true

    // If we do have a route selector, use its routes.
    return localRouteSelector.hasNext()
  }

  /**

        }

        if (connectResult.isSuccess) {
          // We have a connected TCP connection. Cancel and defer the racing connects that all lost.
          cancelInFlightConnects()

          // Finish connecting. We won't have to if the winner is from the connection pool.
          if (!connectResult.plan.isReady) {

        // Verify that multiple threads were processed
        assertTrue("Should process at least one thread", threadCount.get() >= 1);
        assertTrue("Should have stack trace elements", stackTraceCount.get() > 0);
        assertTrue("Should have more stack traces than threads", stackTraceCount.get() > threadCount.get());
    }

    public void test_processThreadDump_withException() {

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (That would also have ensured that its cause was always an Error, rather than possibly another

     * @return An iterator of URL objects for the resources. If no resources are found, the iterator will be empty.
     *         Resources that the class loader does not have access to will not be included.
     * @see java.lang.ClassLoader#getResources(String)
     */
    public static Iterator<URL> getResources(final String name) {
        assertArgumentNotEmpty("name", name);