result.add(sb.toString());
        // lines
        for (String line : lines) {
            sb.setLength(0);
            String[] words = S_FILTER.split(line);
            for (String word : words) {
                if (sb.length() >= remainder - word.length() - (sb.length() > 0 ? 1 : 0)) {
                    repeat(sb, ' ', remainder - sb.length());
                    result.add(BOX_CHAR + " " + sb + " " + BOX_CHAR);

	scanner := bufio.NewScanner(strings.NewReader(input))
	// Set the split function for the scanning operation.
	scanner.Split(bufio.ScanWords)
	// Count the words.
	count := 0
	for scanner.Scan() {
		count++
	}
	if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil {
		fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, "reading input:", err)
	}
	fmt.Printf("%d\n", count)
	// Output: 15
}

	case "s390x":
		return archS390x()
	case "wasm":
		return archWasm()
	}
	return nil
}

func jumpX86(word string) bool {
	return word[0] == 'J' || word == "CALL" || strings.HasPrefix(word, "LOOP") || word == "XBEGIN"
}

func jumpRISCV(word string) bool {
	switch word {
	case "BEQ", "BEQZ", "BGE", "BGEU", "BGEZ", "BGT", "BGTU", "BGTZ", "BLE", "BLEU", "BLEZ",

I think `Union[SomeType, None]` is more explicit about what it means.

It's just about the words and names. But those words can affect how you and your teammates think about the code.

	"BVS":  true,
	"BVC":  true,
	"BHI":  true,
	"BLS":  true,
	"BGE":  true,
	"BLT":  true,
	"BGT":  true,
	"BLE":  true,
	"CALL": true,
	"JMP":  true,
}

func jumpArm(word string) bool {
	return armJump[word]
}

// IsARMCMP reports whether the op (as defined by an arm.A* constant) is
// one of the comparison instructions that require special handling.
func IsARMCMP(op obj.As) bool {
	switch op {

 * offering expected O(n + k log k) performance (worst case O(n log k)) for n calls to {@link
 * #offer} and a call to {@link #topK}, with O(k) memory. In comparison, quickselect has the same
 * asymptotics but requires O(n) memory, and a {@code PriorityQueue} implementation takes O(n log
 * k). In benchmarks, this implementation performs at least as well as either implementation, and
 * degrades more gracefully for worst-case input.
 *

	ECALL						// 73000000
	SCALL						// 73000000
	EBREAK						// 73001000
	SBREAK						// 73001000

	// Arbitrary bytes (entered in little-endian mode)
	WORD	$0x12345678	// WORD $305419896	// 78563412
	WORD	$0x9abcdef0	// WORD $2596069104	// f0debc9a

	// MOV pseudo-instructions
	MOV	X5, X6					// 13830200
	MOV	$2047, X5				// 9302f07f
	MOV	$-2048, X5				// 93020080
	MOV	$2048, X5				// b71200009b820280

      <T extends @Nullable Object> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) {
        List<Iterable<T>> words = Lists.newArrayList();
        words.add(Collections.<T>emptyList());
        for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) {
          words.add(asList(t));
          for (T s : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) {
            words.add(asList(t, s));
          }
        }
        return new Scenario<Iterable<T>>(

      <T extends @Nullable Object> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) {
        List<Iterable<T>> words = Lists.newArrayList();
        words.add(Collections.<T>emptyList());
        for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) {
          words.add(asList(t));
          for (T s : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) {
            words.add(asList(t, s));
          }
        }
        return new Scenario<Iterable<T>>(

							/></option>
						<option value="pdf" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('pdf')}">selected</c:if>><la:message
								key="labels.advance_search_filetype_pdf"
							/></option>
						<option value="word" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('word')}">selected</c:if>><la:message
								key="labels.advance_search_filetype_word"
							/></option>
						<option value="excel" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('excel')}">selected</c:if>><la:message