* different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

 * different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

 *   <li>A stream is <i>single-use</i>; it becomes invalid as soon as any "terminal operation" such
 *       as {@code findFirst()} or {@code iterator()} is invoked. (Even though {@code Stream}
 *       contains all the right method <i>signatures</i> to implement {@link Iterable}, it does not
 *       actually do so, to avoid implying repeat-iterability.) {@code FluentIterable}, on the other
 *       hand, is multiple-use, and does implement {@link Iterable}.

 *   <li>A stream is <i>single-use</i>; it becomes invalid as soon as any "terminal operation" such
 *       as {@code findFirst()} or {@code iterator()} is invoked. (Even though {@code Stream}
 *       contains all the right method <i>signatures</i> to implement {@link Iterable}, it does not
 *       actually do so, to avoid implying repeat-iterability.) {@code FluentIterable}, on the other
 *       hand, is multiple-use, and does implement {@link Iterable}.

            // Try to call the expired method
            // Note: This method may fail in test environments due to system dependencies
            // but we mainly want to ensure the method signature is correct
            testTarget.expired();

            // If we get here, the method executed successfully
            assertTrue("expired method executed successfully", true);
        } catch (Throwable t) {

robolectric-android = "org.robolectric:android-all:16-robolectric-13921718"
robolectric = "org.robolectric:robolectric:4.16"
#noinspection UnusedVersionCatalogEntry
signature-android-apilevel21 = "net.sf.androidscents.signature:android-api-level-21:5.0.1_r2"
#noinspection UnusedVersionCatalogEntry
signature-android-apilevel24 = "net.sf.androidscents.signature:android-api-level-24:7.0_r2"

    }

    public void test_stackTracePopulated() {
        // Test that stack trace is properly populated
        InvalidAccessTokenException exception = new InvalidAccessTokenException("JWT", "Invalid signature");

        StackTraceElement[] stackTrace = exception.getStackTrace();
        assertTrue(stackTrace.length > 0);

        // First element should be from this test method

            </annotations>
            <checkTestClasses>true</checkTestClasses>
            <signature>
              <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo.signature</groupId>
              <artifactId>java18</artifactId>
              <version>1.0</version>
            </signature>
          </configuration>
          <executions>
            <execution>

            <signature>
              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>

     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And
     * eventually this method may go away entirely in favor of an API like
     * whenAllComplete().collectSuccesses(). That API would have a signature more like the current
     * one.
     */
    return new ListFuture<V>(ImmutableList.copyOf(futures), false);
  }