normal para una pequeña ganancia de rendimiento (alrededor de 100 nanosegundos), ten en cuenta que en **FastAPI** el efecto sería bastante opuesto. En estos casos, es mejor usar `async def` a menos que tus *path operation functions* usen código que realice <abbr title="Input/Output: lectura o escritura en disco, comunicaciones de red.">I/O</abbr> de bloqueo.

Aun así, en ambas situaciones, es probable que **FastAPI** [siga siendo más rápida](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank}...

// of the line. The returned buffer is only valid until the next call to
// ReadLine. ReadLine either returns a non-nil line or it returns an error,
// never both.
//
// The text returned from ReadLine does not include the line end ("\r\n" or "\n").
// No indication or error is given if the input ends without a final line end.
// Calling [Reader.UnreadByte] after ReadLine will always unread the last byte read

        }
        return result;
    }

    static void populate(final Reader r) throws IOException {
        String line;
        final BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(r);

        while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
            line = line.toUpperCase().trim();
            if (line.length() == 0) {
                continue;
            }
            if (line.charAt(0) == '#') {

        return result;
    }

    void populate(final Reader r, final CIFSContext tc) throws IOException {
        String line;
        final BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(r);

        while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
            line = line.toUpperCase().trim();
            if (line.length() == 0) {
                continue;
            }
            if (line.charAt(0) == '#') {

                        result = result.replace("${" + key + "}", String.valueOf(value));
                    } else if (value instanceof TestUser) {
                        // Handle TestUser object
                        TestUser user = (TestUser) value;
                        result = result.replace("${" + key + ".name}", user.name);
                        result = result.replace("${" + key + ".age}", String.valueOf(user.age));

So, in our example, we can make `tags` be specifically a "list of strings":

{* ../../docs_src/body_nested_models/tutorial002_py310.py hl[12] *}

## Set types { #set-types }

But then we think about it, and realize that tags shouldn't repeat, they would probably be unique strings.

And Python has a special data type for sets of unique items, the `set`.

Then we can declare `tags` as a set of strings:

}

func (p *processor) Remove(name string) error {
	return (&callback{processor: p}).Remove(name)
}

func (p *processor) Replace(name string, fn func(*DB)) error {
	return (&callback{processor: p}).Replace(name, fn)
}

func (p *processor) compile() (err error) {
	var callbacks []*callback
	removedMap := map[string]bool{}
	for _, callback := range p.callbacks {

    if (!condition) {
      throw new AssertionFailedError(
          template
              .replace("$RELATIONSHIP", relationshipName)
              .replace("$HASH", hashName)
              .replace("$ITEM", itemReporter.reportItem(item))
              .replace("$OTHER", itemReporter.reportItem(other)));
    }
  }

  private Item<T> getItem(int groupNumber, int itemNumber) {

        // Rest of bytes are already 0

        info502.security_descriptor = securityDescriptorBytes;
        info502.sd_size = securityDescriptorBytes.length;

        // Replace info field
        Field infoField = msrpcShareGetInfo.getClass().getSuperclass().getDeclaredField("info");
        infoField.setAccessible(true);
        infoField.set(msrpcShareGetInfo, info502);

     */
    private static byte[] buildSmb2Header() {
        byte[] header = Arrays.copyOf(SMBUtil.SMB2_HEADER, SMBUtil.SMB2_HEADER.length);
        // Mark as server->client response for realism
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(0x00000001, header, 16); // Flags
        // Command SMB2_CREATE (0x0005)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0x0005, header, 12);
        // Some message id
        SMBUtil.writeInt8(1L, header, 24);