* array nor its contents can be null, but it is not useful to force the use of {@code
   * requireNonNull} or the like just to assert that.
   *
   * <p>{@code EqualsTester} will always check that every object it is given returns false from
   * {@code equals(null)}, so it is neither useful nor allowed to include a null value in any
   * equality group.
   */

        // Test getter and setter for newInput
        StopwordsItem item = new StopwordsItem(1, "or");
        assertNull(item.getNewInput());

        item.setNewInput("nor");
        assertEquals("nor", item.getNewInput());

        item.setNewInput("");
        assertEquals("", item.getNewInput());

        item.setNewInput(null);
        assertNull(item.getNewInput());
    }

    }
    Range<C> span = span().canonical(domain);
    if (!span.hasLowerBound()) {
      // according to the spec of canonical, neither this ImmutableRangeSet nor
      // the range have a lower bound
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(
          "Neither the DiscreteDomain nor this range set are bounded below");
    } else if (!span.hasUpperBound()) {
      try {
        domain.maxValue();
      } catch (NoSuchElementException e) {

   * array nor its contents can be null, but it is not useful to force the use of {@code
   * requireNonNull} or the like just to assert that.
   *
   * <p>{@code EqualsTester} will always check that every object it is given returns false from
   * {@code equals(null)}, so it is neither useful nor allowed to include a null value in any
   * equality group.
   */

    return false;
  }

  // Prevent "missing hashCode" warning by explicitly forcing subclasses implement it
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /*
   * The implementation neither produces nor consumes any non-null instance of type C, so
   * casting the type parameter is safe.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  static <C extends Comparable> Cut<C> belowAll() {
    return (Cut<C>) BelowAll.INSTANCE;

   *
   * @deprecated If you must interoperate with a system that requires MD5, then use this method,
   *     despite its deprecation. But if you can choose your hash function, avoid MD5, which is
   *     neither fast nor secure. As of January 2017, we suggest:
   *     <ul>
   *       <li>For security:
   *           {@link Hashing#sha256} or a higher-level API.

   * access. Access time is reset by all cache read and write operations (including {@code
   * Cache.asMap().get(Object)} and {@code Cache.asMap().put(K, V)}), but not by {@code
   * containsKey(Object)}, nor by operations on the collection-views of {@link Cache#asMap}}. So,
   * for example, iterating through {@code Cache.asMap().entrySet()} does not reset access time for
   * the entries you retrieve.
   *

    }
    return new RegularImmutableMap<K, V>(hashTable, alternatingKeysAndValues, n);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash table for the specified keys and values, and ensures that neither keys nor
   * values are null. This method may update {@code alternatingKeysAndValues} if there are duplicate
   * keys. If so, the return value will indicate how many entries are still valid, and will also

 * either {@link Character} or {@link Arrays}.
 *
 * <p>All the operations in this class treat {@code char} values strictly numerically; they are
 * neither Unicode-aware nor locale-dependent.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PrimitivesExplained">primitive utilities</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 1.0
 */

 * either {@link Character} or {@link Arrays}.
 *
 * <p>All the operations in this class treat {@code char} values strictly numerically; they are
 * neither Unicode-aware nor locale-dependent.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PrimitivesExplained">primitive utilities</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 1.0
 */