## Tests de performance et rapidité { #benchmarks-and-speed }

Lorsque vous vérifiez les tests de performance, il est commun de voir plusieurs outils de différents types comparés comme équivalents.

En particulier, on voit Uvicorn, Starlette et FastAPI comparés (parmi de nombreux autres outils).

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

   * to the JDK until JDK 7.
   *
   * @param a the first {@code double} to compare
   * @param b the second {@code double} to compare
   * @return a negative value if {@code a} is less than {@code b}; a positive value if {@code a} is
   *     greater than {@code b}; or zero if they are equal
   */
  @InlineMe(replacement = "Double.compare(a, b)")
  public static int compare(double a, double b) {

    builder.add("baz");
    assertTrue(list.array != builder.contents);
  }

  public void testBuilderAsymptotics() {
    int[] compares = {0};
    Comparator<Integer> countingComparator =
        (i, j) -> {
          compares[0]++;
          return i.compareTo(j);
        };
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<Integer> builder =
        new ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<Integer>(countingComparator, 10);

  }

  /**
   * Compares the two specified {@code int} values. The sign of the value returned is the same as
   * that of {@code ((Integer) a).compareTo(b)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method is now unnecessary and should be treated as deprecated; use the
   * equivalent {@link Integer#compare} method instead.
   *
   * @param a the first {@code int} to compare
   * @param b the second {@code int} to compare

    assertThat(reverse).isNotNull();
  }

  public void testBuilderAsymptotics() {
    int[] compares = {0};
    Comparator<Integer> countingComparator =
        (i, j) -> {
          compares[0]++;
          return i.compareTo(j);
        };
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<Integer> builder =
        new ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<Integer>(countingComparator, 10);

   * @return a negative value if {@code a} is less than {@code b}; a positive value if {@code a} is
   *     greater than {@code b}; or zero if they are equal
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // Integer.compare unavailable under GWT+J2CL
  public static int compare(int a, int b) {
    return Ints.compare(flip(a), flip(b));
  }

  /**
   * Returns the value of the given {@code int} as a {@code long}, when treated as unsigned.
   *

    }
    return builder.toString();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a comparator that compares two {@code byte} arrays <a
   * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexicographical_order">lexicographically</a>. That is, it
   * compares, using {@link #compare(byte, byte)}), the first pair of values that follow any common

#### Corrigez-le avec `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

Mais dans notre code nous utilisons justement `secrets.compare_digest()`.

En bref, il faudra le même temps pour comparer `stanleyjobsox` à `stanleyjobson` que pour comparer `johndoe` à `stanleyjobson`. Il en va de même pour le mot de passe.