return opVal, opErr
	}

	// Need to evaluate the ConditionRHS
	switch {
	case e.ConditionRHS.Compare != nil:
		cmpRight, cmpRErr := e.ConditionRHS.Compare.Operand.evalNode(r, tableAlias)
		if cmpRErr != nil {
			return nil, cmpRErr
		}

		b, err := opVal.compareOp(strings.ToUpper(e.ConditionRHS.Compare.Operator), cmpRight)
		return FromBool(b), err

	case e.ConditionRHS.Between != nil:

	case opEq:
		if len(left) != len(right) {
			return false, nil
		}
		for i, l := range left {
			eq, err := l.compareOp(op, &right[i])
			if !eq || err != nil {
				return eq, err
			}
		}
		return true, nil
	case opIneq:
		for i, l := range left {
			eq, err := l.compareOp(op, &right[i])
			if eq || err != nil {
				return eq, err
			}
		}
		return false, nil
	default:

	bothNumeric := v1.isNumeric() && v2.isNumeric()
	if atleastOneNumeric || !bothNumeric {
		return v1, nil
	}

	if v1.SameTypeAs(*v2) {
		return v1, nil
	}

	cmpResult, cmpErr := v1.compareOp(opEq, v2)
	if cmpErr != nil {
		return nil, cmpErr
	}

	if cmpResult {
		return FromNull(), nil
	}

	return v1, nil
}

func charlen(v *Value) (*Value, error) {

 * compare} methods unconditionally, the {@code ComparisonChain} implementation stops calling its
 * inputs' {@link Comparable#compareTo compareTo} and {@link Comparator#compare compare} methods as
 * soon as one of them returns a nonzero result. This optimization is typically important only in
 * the presence of expensive {@code compareTo} and {@code compare} implementations.
 *

            ComparableVersion c = new ComparableVersion(version);

            if (prev != null) {
                int compare = prev.compareTo(c);
                System.out.println(
                        "   " + prev + ' ' + ((compare == 0) ? "==" : ((compare < 0) ? "<" : ">")) + ' ' + version);
            }

            System.out.println(

## Tests de performance et rapidité

Lorsque vous vérifiez les tests de performance, il est commun de voir plusieurs outils de différents types comparés comme équivalents.

En particulier, on voit Uvicorn, Starlette et FastAPI comparés (parmi de nombreux autres outils).

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

   * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned).
   *
   * @param a value to compare, returned if less than or equal to the rest.
   * @param b value to compare
   * @param c value to compare
   * @param rest values to compare
   * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not <i>mutually comparable</i> under this
   *     ordering.
   */
  @ParametricNullness

  /**
   * A specification for which index to return if the list contains at least one element that
   * compares as equal to the key.
   */
  enum KeyPresentBehavior {
    /**
     * Return the index of any list element that compares as equal to the key. No guarantees are
     * made as to which index is returned, if more than one element compares as equal to the key.
     */
    ANY_PRESENT {
      @Override