Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

So, to balance that out, imagine the following short story:

> You have to clean a big, dirty house.

*Yep, that's the whole story*.

---

	Status   string            `json:"status"`   // Active if rebalance is running, empty otherwise
	Used     float64           `json:"used"`     // Percentage used space
	Progress rebalPoolProgress `json:"progress"` // is empty when rebalance is not running
}

// rebalanceAdminStatus holds rebalance status related information exported to mc, console, etc.
type rebalanceAdminStatus struct {

							NoAuditLog:        true,
						})
					// This can happen when rebalance stop races with ongoing rebalance workers.
					// These rebalance failures can be ignored.
					if err != nil {
						// This can happen when rebalance stop races with ongoing rebalance workers.
						// These rebalance failures can be ignored.

### Load Balancer { #load-balancer }

When using containers, you would normally have some component **listening on the main port**. It could possibly be another container that is also a **TLS Termination Proxy** to handle **HTTPS** or some similar tool.

As this component would take the **load** of requests and distribute that among the workers in a (hopefully) **balanced** way, it is also commonly called a **Load Balancer**.

`https://minio-node-1.example.org`, the redirect URL will be `https://minio-node-1.example.org/oauth_callback` and all is well.

For deployments with a load-balancer (LB), it is required that the LB is configured to send requests from the same user/client-app to the same backend MinIO server (at least for the initial login request and subsequent redirection, as the OpenID auth flow's state parameter is currently local to the MinIO server). For this setup, set the `MINIO_BROWSER_REDIRECT_URL` parameter...

        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> channelManager.shutdown());
    }

    @Test
    void testLoadBalancerAccess() {
        ChannelLoadBalancer balancer = channelManager.getLoadBalancer();
        assertNotNull(balancer);

        // Should return same instance
        assertSame(balancer, channelManager.getLoadBalancer());
    }

    @Test
    void testChannelFailureHandling() throws UnknownHostException {

		return
	}

	// Rebalance routine is run on the first node of any pool participating in rebalance.
	pools.StartRebalance()

	b, err := json.Marshal(struct {
		ID string `json:"id"`
	}{ID: id})
	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

	writeSuccessResponseJSON(w, b)

- 🔒 Secure password hashing by default.
- 🔑 JWT token authentication.
- 📫 Email based password recovery.
- ✅ Tests with [Pytest](https://pytest.org).
- 📞 [Traefik](https://traefik.io) as a reverse proxy / load balancer.
- 🚢 Deployment instructions using Docker Compose, including how to set up a frontend Traefik proxy to handle automatic HTTPS certificates.

import jcifs.internal.smb2.io.Smb2WriteRequest;

/**
 * Load balancer for SMB3 Multi-Channel connections
 */
public class ChannelLoadBalancer {

    private final ChannelManager manager;
    private LoadBalancingStrategy strategy;
    private final AtomicInteger roundRobinCounter;

    /**
     * Create channel load balancer
     *
     * @param manager channel manager
     */

    manager.addChannel(channel2);
    
    // Test load balancer selection
    ChannelLoadBalancer balancer = new ChannelLoadBalancer(manager);
    
    // Large transfer should prefer high-bandwidth channel
    Smb2ReadRequest largeRead = new Smb2ReadRequest();
    largeRead.setLength(10485760);  // 10MB
    
    ChannelInfo selected = balancer.selectChannel(largeRead);