* SecureDirectoryStream} is not supported).
 *
 * <p>{@link RecursiveDeleteOption#ALLOW_INSECURE} can be used to force the recursive delete method
 * to proceed anyway.
 *
 * @since NEXT (but since 21.0 in the JRE flavor)
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ObjCIncompatible // java.nio.file
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

      //   B) if we're getting this path for recursive delete, it's typically not possible to
      //      delete the working dir with a relative path anyway, so it's ok to fail.
      //   C) if we're getting it for opening a new SecureDirectoryStream, there's no need to get
      //      the parent path anyway since we can safely open a DirectoryStream to the path without
      //      worrying about a symlink.
      return null;
    } else {

      //   B) if we're getting this path for recursive delete, it's typically not possible to
      //      delete the working dir with a relative path anyway, so it's ok to fail.
      //   C) if we're getting it for opening a new SecureDirectoryStream, there's no need to get
      //      the parent path anyway since we can safely open a DirectoryStream to the path without
      //      worrying about a symlink.
      return null;
    } else {

    arraycopy(contents, 0, result, 0, contents.length);
    return result;
  }

  /*
   * a "type A" unmodifiable collection freaks out proactively, even if there
   * wasn't going to be any actual work to do anyway
   */

  @Override
  public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends E> elementsToAdd) {
    throw up();
  }

  @Override
  public boolean removeAll(Collection<?> elementsToRemove) {
    throw up();

        } else {
            paths.put(id, path);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Retrieve a stream of the project's artifacts.
     * Do not include the POM artifact as the file can't be set anyway.
     */
    private Stream<org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact> getProjectArtifacts(MavenProject project) {
        return Stream.concat(Stream.of(project.getArtifact()), project.getAttachedArtifacts().stream());
    }

                    || actualOsName.contains("me")
                    // wince isn't really 9x, but crippled enough to
                    // be a muchness. Maven doesnt run on CE, anyway.
                    || actualOsName.contains("ce"));
            isNT = !is9x;
        }
        switch (family) {
            case FAMILY_WINDOWS:
                return isWindows;

            })
        .named("AbstractSet")
        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.NONE,
            CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES,
            CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER, // in this case, anyway
            CollectionSize.ANY)
        .suppressing(suppressForAbstractSet())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  public Test testsForBadlyCollidingHashSet() {
    return SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(

            Snapshot snapshot = new Snapshot();

            // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
            snapshot.setTimestamp(getDeploymentTimestamp());

            // we update the build number anyway so that it doesn't get lost. It requires the timestamp to take effect
            try {
                int buildNumber = resolveLatestSnapshotBuildNumber(artifact, localRepository, remoteRepository);

   */
  // Use (first, rest) so that `of(someLongArray)` won't compile (they should use copyOf), which is
  // okay since we have to copy the just-created array anyway.
  public static ImmutableLongArray of(long first, long... rest) {
    checkArgument(
        rest.length <= Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1, "the total number of elements must fit in an int");

   */
  // Use (first, rest) so that `of(someIntArray)` won't compile (they should use copyOf), which is
  // okay since we have to copy the just-created array anyway.
  public static ImmutableIntArray of(int first, int... rest) {
    checkArgument(
        rest.length <= Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1, "the total number of elements must fit in an int");
    int[] array = new int[rest.length + 1];