}
		if osErrToFileErr(err) == errFileNotFound {
			resp = checkPartFileNotFound
		}
		return
	}
	if st.Mode().IsDir() {
		resp = checkPartFileNotFound
		return
	}
	// Check if shard is truncated.
	if st.Size() < expectedSize {
		resp = checkPartFileCorrupt
		return
	}
	return checkPartSuccess
}

// CheckParts check if path has necessary parts available.

  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>test</groupId>
      <artifactId>a</artifactId>
      <version>0.2</version>
      <scope>system</scope>
      <systemPath>should-use-variables-and-not-hard-code-this-path</systemPath>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>test</groupId>
      <artifactId>b</artifactId>
      <version>0.1</version>
      <scope>system</scope>

        assertTrue(result.getFatals().get(2).contains("parent.version"));
    }

    @Test
    void testHardCodedSystemPath() throws Exception {
        SimpleProblemCollector result = validateRaw("hard-coded-system-path.xml");

        assertViolations(result, 0, 0, 3);

        assertContains(
                result.getWarnings().get(0),

          - "!**/operator/**"
          - "!**/istioctl/**"
          - "!**/tools/bug-report/**"
          # This should only really import operator API, but that is hard to express without a larger refactoring
          - "!**/pkg/kube/**"
          - "!**/pkg/url/**"
          - "!**/pkg/test/framework/**"
          - "!**/tests/fuzz/**"
        deny:

   * non-deterministic behavior at an undetermined time in the future.
   *
   * <p>Note that the fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed as it is, generally
   * speaking, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent
   * modification. Fail-fast iterators throw {@code ConcurrentModificationException} on a

          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;
          toReturn = new FutureAsCancellable(immediateCancelledFuture());
        } finally {

* 🌐 Add French translation for FastAPI People. PR [#2232](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/2232) by [@JulianMaurin](https://github.com/JulianMaurin).
* 🌐 Add Korean translation for Tutorial - Path Parameters. PR [#2355](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/2355) by [@hard-coders](https://github.com/hard-coders).

   * non-deterministic behavior at an undetermined time in the future.
   *
   * <p>Note that the fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed as it is, generally
   * speaking, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent
   * modification. Fail-fast iterators throw {@code ConcurrentModificationException} on a

                                Version.V20,
                                prefix + prefix2 + "systemPath",
                                key,
                                "should use a variable instead of a hard-coded path " + sysPath,
                                dependency);
                    } else if (sysPath.contains("${basedir}") || sysPath.contains("${project.basedir}")) {
                        addViolation(

	b.WriteString("0")                         // easy
	b.WriteString("123456")                    // still easy
	b.WriteString("7890")                      // easy after flush
	b.WriteString("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy") // hard
	b.WriteString("z")
	if err := b.Flush(); err != nil {
		t.Error("WriteString", err)
	}
	s := "01234567890abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
	if buf.String() != s {