build:avx_win --copt=/arch:AVX

# Use Clang-cl compiler on Windows
build:win_clang --copt=/clang:-Weverything
build:win_clang --extra_toolchains=@local_config_cc//:cc-toolchain-x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --extra_execution_platforms=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --host_platform=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --compiler=clang-cl
build:win_clang --linkopt=/FORCE:MULTIPLE

            realm.importFrom(parentRealm, "");
        } else if (STRATEGY_PLUGIN.equals(classLoadingStrategy)) {
            coreExports.getExportedPackages().forEach((p, cl) -> realm.importFrom(cl, p));
            providedArtifacts = coreExports.getExportedArtifacts();
        } else if (STRATEGY_SELF_FIRST.equals(classLoadingStrategy)) {
            realm.setParentRealm(parentRealm);
        } else {

        if (cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE) && !cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE_DEPENDENTS)) {
            return MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_MAKE_UPSTREAM;
        } else if (!cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE) && cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE_DEPENDENTS)) {
            return MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_MAKE_DOWNSTREAM;

     */
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *
       * Similarly, do we really want to log the same Error more than once?
       */
      log(throwable);
    }
  }

     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we
     * used Object[], we might be able to optimize toArray() to use clone() sometimes. (See
     * cl/592273615 and cl/592273683.)
     */
    public Builder(Comparator<? super E> comparator) {
      this(comparator, ImmutableCollection.Builder.DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY);
    }

     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we
     * used Object[], we might be able to optimize toArray() to use clone() sometimes. (See
     * cl/592273615 and cl/592273683.)
     */
    public Builder(Comparator<? super E> comparator) {
      this.comparator = checkNotNull(comparator);
    }

    Builder(Comparator<? super E> comparator, int expectedKeys) {