ListenableFuture -- but is also available in a second "version" that
    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()
    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of
    // Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(), but it is a signal that its documentation may need updating as

            I strongly believe that this proposal aligns with it.
          required: true
        - label: >
            I have visited the [idea graveyard](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/IdeaGraveyard),
            and did not see anything similar to this idea.

opportunity for showing off her knowledge, as there was no one to
listen to her, still it was good practice to say it over) `--yes,
that's about the right distance--but then I wonder what Latitude
or Longitude I've got to?'  (Alice had no idea what Latitude was,
or Longitude either, but thought they were nice grand words to
say.)

  Presently she began again.  `I wonder if I shall fall right
THROUGH the earth!  How funny it'll seem to come out among the

   * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-16">UTF-16</a> before calling this method.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> When implementing an escaper it is a good idea to override this method for
   * efficiency by inlining the implementation of {@link #nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence, int, int)}
   * directly. Doing this for {@link com.google.common.net.PercentEscaper} more than doubled the

    Ordering<Integer> e = integers.compound(numbers);

    // This works with three levels too (IDEA falsely reports errors as noted
    // below. Both javac and eclipse handle these cases correctly.)

    Ordering<Number> f = numbers.compound(objects).compound(objects); // bad IDEA
    Ordering<Number> g = objects.compound(numbers).compound(objects);

    Ordering<Integer> e = integers.compound(numbers);

    // This works with three levels too (IDEA falsely reports errors as noted
    // below. Both javac and eclipse handle these cases correctly.)

    Ordering<Number> f = numbers.compound(objects).compound(objects); // bad IDEA
    Ordering<Number> g = objects.compound(numbers).compound(objects);

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()
    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of
    // Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(), but it is a signal that its documentation may need updating as

   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> the overhead of measurement can be more than a microsecond, so it is generally
   * not useful to specify {@link TimeUnit#NANOSECONDS} precision here.
   *
   * <p>It is generally not a good idea to use an ambiguous, unitless {@code long} to represent
   * elapsed time. Therefore, we recommend using {@link #elapsed()} instead, which returns a
   * strongly-typed {@code Duration} instance.
   *

opportunity for showing off her knowledge, as there was no one to
listen to her, still it was good practice to say it over) `--yes,
that's about the right distance--but then I wonder what Latitude
or Longitude I've got to?'  (Alice had no idea what Latitude was,
or Longitude either, but thought they were nice grand words to
say.)

  Presently she began again.  `I wonder if I shall fall right
THROUGH the earth!  How funny it'll seem to come out among the