assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("@", "`"));
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

 * this annotation specifies each of the different sizes for which a test suite should be built. (In
 * a typical case, the features should include {@link CollectionSize#ANY}.) These semantics are thus
 * a little different from those of other Collection-related features such as {@link
 * CollectionFeature} or {@link SetFeature}.
 *

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

  /*
   * Memory visibility of these fields. There are two cases to consider.
   *
   * 1. visibility of the writes to these fields to Fire.run:
   *
   * The initial write to delegateRef is made definitely visible via the semantics of
   * addListener/SES.schedule. The later racy write in cancel() is not guaranteed to be observed,
   * however that is fine since the correctness is based on the atomic state in our base class. The

 * this annotation specifies each of the different sizes for which a test suite should be built. (In
 * a typical case, the features should include {@link CollectionSize#ANY}.) These semantics are thus
 * a little different from those of other Collection-related features such as {@link
 * CollectionFeature} or {@link SetFeature}.
 *

    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("@", "`"));
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()

 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.

 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.

 * reentrant, so a thread may enter a monitor any number of times, and then must leave the same
 * number of times. The <i>enter</i> and <i>leave</i> operations have the same synchronization
 * semantics as the built-in Java language synchronization primitives.
 *
 * <p>A call to any of the <i>enter</i> methods with <b>void</b> return type should always be